this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
65 points (94.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12203 readers
420 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this idea will see the light of day.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

They can stick that mirror where the sun don’t shine.

[–] don@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Imagine a malicious person constantly aiming the light at at the house of someone they don’t like. Good thing it doesn’t seem to be feasible any time soon.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"I want a spot, but I want all of my sunlight focused onto a spot about a centimeter across. I'll give you the coordinates."

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because the sun is not a point source but a disk half a degree across, you can’t focus the sun tighter than about a 1km spot from a mirror in low earth orbit.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Okay but can we make that 1 km hot enough to burn everything inside of it?

For science of course.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Welp I hate to break it to you, but the Ruskies actually already tried this one back in the 90s, and I’m fairly certain the business idea is based directly on that concept.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In a tent would be even worse.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Seems like a lot of planning to get the person you don't like to live in a tent first.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are ways.

None so far as I’m aware that are actually legal, mind. But why let that get in the way of one’s dastardly plans?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Possibly some type of incendiary device?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I was kind of thinking chemical. Unleash a pack of grumpy skunks and get them to spray everything.

Freakish, sure, but plausibly deniable.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I was thinking more they were on a trip somewhere.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

So if they over concentrate does this turn into an 'ant in a magnifying glass' situation?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Could it be used to break up protests?

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

If by "break up" you mean on a molecular level, then yes.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Theoretically, but I don't see protests or riots stopping because of light.. riots happen in the day, too, and the violent ones are going to be masked up so more light won't do anything to reveal their identity

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

It will be stopped if the protests are vaporized

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Was thinking the exact same thing. Also if this took off doesn't seem like it would help the global warming situation. "Let's add more energy to our planetary greenhouse!"

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Surely not. Mirrors are incapable of destruction. Why that would be dangerous! You could burn crops or boil away water reserves. Surely no corporation would so irresponsible!

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

commoditize sunlight

Absolute ghouls

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 4 points 2 months ago

It's not like they are taking it away from you. Just selling you extra you don't need

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Isn't light pollution like that just illegal?

Edit: In the US, it is in some states, though not all. Haven't found a source for Europe yet.

https://www.ncsl.org/environment-and-natural-resources/states-shut-out-light-pollution

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I don't like it when companies mess with the sky. Don't fuck with my stars.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

FFS, we don't need more sun hitting our planet right now, we need less. Much less. Have the mirror reflect sunlight away from the planet. Then it'd be useful

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago

if someone stares directly at it will it hurt their eye?