this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
-12 points (42.7% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The only purpose of their ceasefire bullshit rhetoric is for liberals to parrot 'they called for a ceasefire, what else can they do?' In the meantime more brown people get killed

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

The real solution is deinvestment. Even a little bit will cause Israel to do more than just talk. Either they’ll scale back the genocide, or they’ll start saying the quiet bits out loud. Either is better than the current situation.

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yup. And eventually all gone there. The plan isn't secret, they post on social media and make news conferences about the new Israeli territory's geographical boundaries.

They've even made references to the greater land they claim which extends all around neighbour countries. Obviously they're not going to invade Saudi... Today. But start making the PR claim today, and eventually the rhetoric moves with it

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Intercept:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theintercept.com/2024/08/22/biden-harris-israel-ceasefire-gaza/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support