this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
185 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

31182 readers
547 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know this will sound paranoid as fuck, but I've really been thinking about Microsoft lately. Like, they're pushing their Recall shit whether we like it or not. The fact that it even made it past the concept stage tells me that no one at Microsoft gives a single fuck about their users anymore. The final shreds of any trust I had in them as a company are gone and I've started thinking of them as an adversary.

Today I was considering Teams in particular. My company has been using it for maybe six years. When our email provider went teats up, I did some research and realized we had Microsoft cloud stuff included in our Action Pack subscription. We started using their email, and about the same time we started using Teams.

Teams offers EEE but only on Teams Premium, which we don't pay extra for. Microsoft has access to every message and chat. They could be saving transcripts and voice calls. They might have accumulated billions of hours of voice data by now.

What could they do with all this data?

  1. Sell to LEO
  2. Commit corporate espionage
  3. Gather government secrets
  4. Use for AI training

Something else just occurred to me. I did research a while back on the software stacks that big tech companies use. Not one uses IIS.

I've been a Windows developer for thirty years. I used to like Microsoft. I looked forward to new versions of Windows and Visual Studio. Now I feel like they've lured us all in slowly until we put our throats in their jaws. Fucking mental.

Talk me down, if you can.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 82 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All I can do is talk you up. I think it's a lot worse than what you've highlighted.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For real. We already know Microsoft is a leader in data collection, economic espionage, and surveillance capitalism. We know for a fact they gave secret police real-time backdoors into their systems and all data they hold the encryption keys to.

[–] zelnix@lemmy.ml 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

On a related note, within the past year microshit made it so you can't join a teams meeting on their android app unless you give it permission to see your phone number

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Teams is absolutely used already or going to be used to train AI. Probably already has been used in corporate espionage. And yes, IIS is a steaming pile of shit compared to the alternatives. It's really only even entertained as an option at smaller businesses in my experience.

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Teams is absolutely used already or going to be used to train AI.

It is, it's already doing transcripts and summaries / meeting minutes in the corpo I work in. I'm astonished how much they trust and rely on Microsoft services without giving it a second thought.

[–] mmhmm@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I work with our complianceand privacy attorneys and the contracts we maintain protect our data, state it is ours, and guarantees it is not used to train on ai.

I hate ms as much as anyone hear but it is misguided to think no one is protecting your or your companies intersects.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The contract only works if Microsoft complies with it.

Why wouldn’t they, they don’t care and are unlikely to get caught stealing the data the agreed not to steal. How are you going to find out, how are you then going to sue them and how are you going to replace the services. The reality is most businesses won’t find out, they won’t sue if they do and they’ll continue using Microsoft services.

[–] mmhmm@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

They are a corporation. They exist to make money for ahareholders. The reputational harm of mass surveiling their peer corpos is colossal. Sure, their could absolutely be a rouge individual and we see it time and time again, but mass scale hovering of another companies IP? Nah, expecting that borders conspiracy.

Microsoft and their business practices are shit. It is very much a take it or leave it scenerio. Amazon, the competition, just went all in on M365 services for their operations. You expect that MS is actively stealing their data to enrich themselves. Sure, possible. Their teck would allow it, but I bet the service contract mandates consent and observation anytime an MS agent engages with Amazon's deployment. And I'd bet it all they honor that contract.

Why risk everything on spying? They are doing just fine sucking up the publics data when contracts aren't in place. Individuals should stay the fuck away but big coropos is another game entirely

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose pointing out MS also owns linkedin isn’t the talk down you’re looking for?

If you’re a dev, this along with GitHub, and your employer using teams, is a pretty severe panopticon.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They don't own git and they don't own your infrastructure.

[–] tranarchist@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 weeks ago

> my company feeds all our data to big tech

> is big tech gonna use that data for malicios purposes?

there's your answer

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no one at Microsoft gives a single fuck about their users anymore

I don't think they ever did.

[–] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the past they at least tried to pretend.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

I guess nobody remembers windows ME any more?

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course they do. It's to be expected that big tech companies use all data they can gather for training AIs, tracking users, creating psychological profiles of the users and selling data to the highest bidders.

Microsoft is also known for creating tools and products which track employees and workers and provide nice looking dashboards and statistics for the employers. And they partner up with Palantir and other companies to create even more effective surveillance solutions for companies and law enforcement to use eventually. MS is a data company since a couple of years, just like Google or Meta is. Data is very valuable.

In the case of Microsoft Office and Teams, there's also the issue of corporate espionage. Companies from all over the world are freely giving away sensitive data about their documents, employees and projects to a US-based megacorp. There was a time in history when this would be called corporate espionage which is supposed to be bad and illegal and so on. But, since they're all doing it voluntarily, and there's no definite proof of MS doing anything because it's a black box and no one except MS can inspect what they're doing, it's apparently "fine". It's like we have collectively become dangerously naive.

So yeah, it's all "fine". Until it isn't. Until it is revealed one day. Then we can all be shocked and say "how could they do this, how could they violate our trust like that, their marketing slides looked so nice and the consultant was so charming and said we needn't to worry about anything they would keep our data safe". Well, if you trusted them in the first place, that's your mistake. You cannot trust a company like MS, Meta, Google, TikTok, and so on with a huge track record of privacy violations. Ever. Cloud = someone else's computer. Host your own stuff. Prefer not to use software with proven track records of privacy violations. Don't use products or services from companies with such track records. Prefer open source over proprietary because when the code is openly auditable that's a plus for trustworthiness, and proprietary applications usually have a bad track record of privacy violations and other anti-user features, while open source software rarely includes such things.

And it's only going to get worse. With upcoming things like Recall, that's almost like having a permanent camera behind you recording your screen at all times. I feel bad for all Windows users, but on the other hand, I don't actually have to care. Keep trusting them blindly, but please don't be surprised when it will come crashing down on you one day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antihumanitarian@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Given the ease of implantation of end to end encryption now, it's a reasonable assumption that anything not e2ee is being data mined. E2ee has extensive security benefits, for example even if your data is dumped the info is still useless. So, there has to be a compelling reason to not use it.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They've already given away that they use teams to track stuff. I forget the context, but some teams person said that they get less activity after 3:30 in the context of some article about working from home. Revealed that they were tracking mouse usage with teams indirectly.

[–] theroff@aussie.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] gg12@techhub.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

@sgibson5150 all valid points and the business practice they employed many times before. Embrace, extend, and extinguish. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Uhh dude have you ever looked into what types of characters run these companies? You're just an npc to them.

Do you really think our current economic system incentivizes good behavior? It's all about being exploitative, and so it filters out anybody who cares about others. If they don't, then someone else will. Take a look at starbucks. They don't pay taxes in for example Germany. If they did, as other coffee shops do, they will go down. So the system dynamics filter out the people who are prepared to not care about others.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sell to LEO

Low Earth Orbit? I hate TLAs

[–] sgibson5150@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh sorry I meant law enforcement. Not sure what my dumb ass was trying to abbreviate there.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Law Enforcement Organizations, it's a valid initialism

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always read it as Law Enforcement Officer

[–] subignition@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

I imagine it can be used that way too!

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

What makes you hate tiny little ants?

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry. It came out years ago that Win 10 keylogged and told home all about it (justified as to improve our predictive typing software ) even though there were no promises in the ToS to limit its spyware use, I screamed about how the fucking sky is fucking falling, and now Windows 10 is in bunches of US businesses, and more than a few outside the US. It even says in the EULA MS will snitch on you to law enforcement about anything it feels like.

So yeah, all the people who have legitimate businesses that have real secrets (and break laws as a matter of course) have all wittingly chosen to give Microsoft all the biographical leverage MS needs to take over the world. (Some companies actually got their tech teams to defang the Win10 spyware. But more didn't than did.)

Now I'm one of those 1960s hippies who screamed about the rising police state in the US to whom no one listened. Another Cassandra crying like a bainsidhe into the wind.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Yeah, just as Zoom.

Jitsi for the win! And also Big Blue Button, for certain settings that may be better.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Oh you have no idea how deep my paranoia on this goes! We've been implementing Dynamics 365 at my office, MS made software that manages your entire business from the accounting ledgers on out. Copilot AI is everywhere in it, trying to encourage you to teach it how to do things.

MS wants to offer the next generation of knowledge worker. No more accountants, no more senior managers of inventories and all those many miscellaneous titles it takes to run a company. Certainly no more technical support. AI is going to do it all. MS wants to tell every business how to do business.

[–] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Talk me down from the paranoia place

Where the data’s cataloged and sent to cop space

Reflections on trusting trust 🎶

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 5 points 2 weeks ago

Every single corporation is doing what they're legally bound to do: increase profits for shareholders. Companies don't and never have cared about the customer. They care about a customer as much as you care about an NPC. What's with people thinking that they ever cared??

Of course MS is using that data. Why wouldn't they?? Would they lose customers if people found out? Nope. If you were in charge of making that decision, you would use that data too. And if you're too held to your privacy morals, you'll never be in that position at MS because they only place people that will decide to maximize profits.

Here's how you know a company is doing something: Would it make them more money? Then theyre doing it. That's it.

Also, it's MICROSOFT!! lol Not Mozilla, RedHat, Canonical, or the Linux Foundation. Remember when someone shoved a pie in Bill Gates face?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Teams is built on top of the old SKYPE infrastructure. It is a bastardisation of Skype (communications) and SharePoint (data storage)

As it is built on Skype, all the acces Leo had as part of Skype still exist. MS is a US org and have the legal requirements to tap communications for Leo.

[–] aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, watch the network traffic from Teams and kind hard not to think of them as data harvesters. In a day, there are close to a hundred servers involved that will leave your country for no functional reason

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not one uses IIS.

How sure are you about that? I work for a global MSP and see it all the time.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I lost the trust with windows 8 :)

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I lost the trust with MS DOS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

When you say billions of hours, I would keep things in perspective. AI and storage aren't free. They'll only save the important stuff. The solution to saving yourself, us, and all of humanity is to never do anything important or useful. So the good news is if we go back to work and slack off as we've always done, we'll outsmart them and save us all!

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

"anymore" 🤣

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Down? You're only going to get talked up here.

Wait till your average desktop computer has enough power to train models. Every single application out there will have a trained model and everything you've ever written or done. The train data set is tiny they could have it easily uploaded and then query it for marketing data against you.

AIs lossy compression is astounding, and it's level of error is absolutely no big deal for marketing.

load more comments
view more: next ›