this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

19849 readers
365 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I saw that happen once in a big presentation.

There was a team of students presenting their work to ~200 people. Right in the middle, a pop-up says updates are finished and the computer needs to restart. It has a helpful 60-second countdown, but "cancel" is grayed out, so all they can do is watch.

I was only in the audience and I still have nightmares.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Then it proceeds to take 10 minutes to boot. Happened to me before an important meeting once and i just couldn't believe it. wtf makes Microsoft think they can get away with shit like this?

[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Probably that they very obviously are!

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Just blame the users. Easy.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They think they can get away with it because they keep getting away with it.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because the alternative is people getting compromised and getting their computer crypto locked, accounts stolen or their bank account drained.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Other OSes can update everything while running and you just reboot to the updated system. Microsoft could definitely fix their update process they are not incompetent, they just don't care.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The super duper shitty thing is that they could have canceled it by opening the Run dialog box and typing "shutdown -a", so it's not even like canceling wasn't an option. M$ just decided to be dicks about it

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe? If I recall correctly, this was Windows XP. Also the computer was owned by the school, so the students didn't have admin access.

[–] DV8@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That screen didn't exist in Win XP. If it had, it would have been a different shade of blue. This is either Win10 though I suspect it's Win11.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The event I'm referring to wasn't OP's photo. Mine was back in 2004 or 2005, long before Win10 was released.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

shutdown -a couldn't help in that situation?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love these comments. If you need to use the command line (the largest argument people have against Linux) why are people still arguing to stay on Windows? Hell, Linux you don't even need the terminal if you don't want to use it and choose the right distro.

(I recognize that for schools and offices, people don't have a choice. These students were probably on a personal laptop though, so they could have a choice. The issue is Windows comes as default and no one actually makes a choice. They don't choose Windows. They just have Windows.)

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Windows always gets a pass from it's fans. They also tend to overestimate average users' proficiency with computers (meaning windows) way more than linux users.

Most windows users would be afraid to change stuff on CP or Settings never mind opening up policy editor or registry editor.

They regularly fail to install applications on windows (a big part of them would probably not even try) or install something different than intended.

Usually they end up running million unnecessary things on startup, having completely unresponsive systems. They just shrug and cope with it till they pay someone to format their computer or they buy a new one.

[–] Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The arrogance of some Linux users... You just can't fathom that most people just want to use the OS their PC came with. These people don't want to struggle with the incompatibilities that come with Linux systems. Troubleshooting Linux systems is a daunting task for most casual users. It's great that you use Linux because fuck greedy corporations. But stop being so uppity about it. This toxic behavior is what steers people away from Linux forums.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

You just can’t fathom that most people just want to use the OS their PC came with.

No they don't they want to get a task done. The vast majority of users doesn't know what an OS or a browser is never mind that there are alternatives.

These people don’t want to struggle with the incompatibilities that come with Linux systems.

Most people are simply not aware of Linux systems let alone linux system incompatibilities.

Troubleshooting Linux systems is a daunting task for most casual users.

No shit, troubleshooting windows is a daunting task for most casual users. They either nag/pay someone to try and fix it or simply cope with it. And windows fucks up all the time, especially for most users.

It’s great that you use Linux because fuck greedy corporations. But stop being so uppity about it. This toxic behavior is what steers people away from Linux forums.

People don't just randomly get on Linux forums, especially linux memes forums. Nor is my previous comment in any way or form toxic. I just pointed out the blind spot of windows fans, you just can't handle criticism.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This might take several minutes

...or itcould take several hours

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Don't turn off" is the worst kind of status message.

When it eventually hangs for various reasons, you actually do need to turn off your pc for it to complete or to let it roll back in an error state.

When "just hang in there" is still present on the third day you'll start wondering why you bought that piece of furniture and won't mind the consequences of turning it off.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What should it say instead?

[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Console output with status of the current operation, including error and warning messages

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The average user does not want to see that and does not need to see that. That’s how you end up with thousands of support requests of “why is my computer showing these errors?”

Things should be abstracted from the users by default. There’s no need for grandma to see a console output every time windows needs to update.

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I disagree. I think that some aspects of the software should be open about what they're doing to everyone. Otherwise people just get used to the idea that everything is a black box that they have no real control of. It also helps educate people on IT and its concepts overall.

Even if they can't specifically tell what is going on, they can see something is going on. And as long as this does not make it harder to use, the more info the better.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This looks like a public office space. You really gonna go argue with the building admin?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Hey boss, the display in the corner office automatically updated. Can we get IT to switch everything to Linux?"

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"why would we do that? Our systems don't work on that, our people aren't trained on that, no, get back to work"

I think that would be a pretty accurate reply to a casual request for an entire infrastructure change

[–] EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"there is a bomb strapped to my chest, if you don't install Linux on every computer in here I will explode taking you with me"

I wouldn't recommend this method but It might work out

[–] pkmkdz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Next day headlines:
"Linux user blows up an office. Is Linux a cult?"

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why you check your equipment before any important events

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What if Windows decided to update after you finished checking the equipment? I mean, they do use AI to determine the worst time for an update...

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My favorite windows update was when I was attending an onsite coding competition hosted my Microsoft. We were all in this large meeting hall that looked like a theater, and we spent first 10 minutes or so at the start of the competition just looking at Windows update, with the Microsoft rep apologizing to us, because his pc decided to do the "Forced update restart you cant postpone any more" literally two minutes into the presentation

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

When your dog food tastes like dog food