this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
160 points (93.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats have made restoring abortion access a cornerstone of their campaign for the White House and Congress, but there are divisions over what, exactly, that means.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Given the deplorable state of women's health even before Roe was struck down, might be a good idea to go farther and throw out the Hyde Amendment while you're at it. There's no compelling reason to deny women access to contraception and termination as part of Medicaid, given that this was routinely available through private insurance for decades.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It isn't enough. We need codified guarantees of an unalienable right to bodily autonomy for all citizens, with explicit statements clarifying that the people have a right to abortion and contraception so that courts can't willfully misinterpret the law.

As a stepping stone to that goal reinstating roe is a good first step.

[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But also phrased in such a way that anti-vaxxers can't hide behind some flimsy excuse and endanger us all

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Add "if you want to put yourself at risk that's cool. If you want to put your society at risk then you need to leave it. Deserters will receive one Coleman pup tent and water for 3 days. No weapons."

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the first step, though.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Contentment with a first step results in it being the only step.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Perfect is the enemy of good.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

If Democrats ever think of rising to the level of "acceptable" we'll start talking about perfect and good.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

See: safe injection.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why in the gods damned fuck does congress get a say in my medical decisions‽ Especially considering they aren’t even paying for them.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Why in the gods damned fuck does congress get a say in my medical decisions

Because keeping the filibuster around is a higher priority than human rights.