Housing is too cheap? Now that's a problem I'd like to have
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
104 points (99.1% liked)
World News
38500 readers
2699 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I’m a homeowner and I support this message. Couldn’t afford the house I live in today and we only bought it 4 years ago.
Affordable housing is fantastic for everyone, but values of houses falling is kinda scary.
There's definitely a house of cards feeling in real estate in China, and if there were any sort of collapse it would be felt around the world.
As in any economic instability, the wealthy can consolidate their positions and the poors just get pushed further into the mud.
For those who only own one home, this is not really a bad thing. They don't survive off of the equity of their house. It's a house. It provides shelter and amenities. They will even pay less on property tax.
This really only hurts those that own more than one home. And to that I say, Fuck Em.
You seem to have misunderstood my comment.
The situation in China could deteriorate into global financial collapse.
Yes houses might be cheaper, but with extreme unemployment, inflation, interest, foreclosures et cetera it would be much more difficult to acquire your one house than it is now.
You're saying only wealthy people would suffer, but that's not how financial instability works - the poor always do the heavy lifting.
When everyone loses everything, those who had nothing feel the impact less.
Sorry, you just don't seem to get it.
You may "have nothing" now, but I imagine you at least have an opportunity to obtain a slave-wage level job, and food on the table.
In a global financial collapse, you wouldn't have those things, and there would be violence and unrest.
It's not as though people with houses lose them and everyone gets respawned with no gear. It's more like wealthy people don't notice, people with mortgages struggle to make payments, and people who currently "have nothing" pay more for everything.
This is absolutely one of those "be careful what you wish for" type situations.
I think it's you who doesn't get it. In a financial collapse, it's not the plumbers, electricians, or machinists who will be out of work. It will be the investment bankers, the lawyers, and the middle managers.
They need us far more than we need them.
Thats... just not how economies work.
Yes, but aren't we talking about a scenario where the economy doesn't work?
No.
I'm pretty sure that's the definition of a global financial collapse
You're not making any sense.
Economies in the midst of a global financial collapse are still economies, whether people are trading securities on a stock market or trading chickens for bullets.
To your point, plumbers carpenters and machinists need demand for their services in order to be employed. In a recession demand for everything cools, and unemployment rises. This isn't abstract theory, but well established and easily observable throughout history.
You said people with only one home won't care about property values which is patently false. When people end up unemployed and owing 150% of the value of their property they simply choose to stop making repayments, because bankruptcy is a more appealing option than paying off a loan for nothing. This is exactly what happened just 15 years ago in the sub-prime lending crisis, and again an easily observable mechanism occurring in very recent history.
The web is awash with articles explaining the impact of China's downturn. Notably in Australia it will cost Iron Ore miners $3b. Everyone's pensions are heavily invested in these companies, and they employ many plumbers, electricians, and machinists.
As I started off by saying, affordable housing is a fantastic goal, but hoping for a collapse in the Chinese property market is not the way.
Wasn't Evergrande supposed to collapse a year or two ago?
Yes.
Love how hard this article tries to portray this as a bad thing lmao
Australia when?