this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw this today, and ... well, I'm not going to be so forgiving to people suggesting to vote Third Party rather than vote for Biden. If Trump wants me to do something, and you want me to do that same something, that tells me you're aligned with Trump.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Oh, you mean like all of those "I can't bring myself to vote for Biden because he's not doing enough for Palestine" comments everywhere?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Or all the jagoffs talking about how Zelenskyy is a "Nazi" and blaming Biden/Ukraine for what Putin has done...

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But how else can someone feel morally superior while simultaneously assisting the candidate that will accelerate any genocides going on in other countries?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

the candidate that will accelerate any genocides going on in other countries?

Or, indeed, in Palestine itself. Trump, after all, is the candidate who wants Netanyahu to "finish the job" of killing them off.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Better, I've gotten some of these:

"Because of YOU PERSONALLY I am going to vote for Trump but was going to vote for Biden before"

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I saw a couple of those just today.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh no if only a single person on the internet hadn't upset them, they could have voted for harm reduction. But now they have to vote contrary to what they want. So tragic.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not so different from those saying that Hillary speaking plainly about awful people somehow did her election in..."zomg! If only Hillary had not said something something basket!1111"

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Repubs have zero principles nor integrity. The same assholes who were screeching about emails are saying it's okay to sell classified documents out of a bathroom. They pick some rhetoric they like and latch on. I don't know how many of them deliberately coordinate on that kind of lie or if most just see it and repeat it.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's not even clever. It's the same strategy as 2016 promoting Jill Stein.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

And Jill Stein all those other times too...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yep. How many times were that sort telling everyone that Hillary would "start WWIII"? How often do they say it even now?

[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I will not be voting for the genocide suppier no matter what you say.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You morally should vote as effectively as you can EVERY TIME. EVERY vote on the left moves the conversation left.

What you're advocating is a disastrous take, and you're falling for classic voter suppression tactics. If you vote for Trump he backs Israel AND Russia. If you don't vote at all, or throw away your vote, you're helping politics move towards the right. It's like a game of tug of war and you're giving up before it starts.

Rush said it best "if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice"

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is what I can't stand about these "I will not vote for Biden" Neanderthals. They're not making a point by abstaining; they're indirectly aiding Trump while pretending they have the moral high ground.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

I used to be them in my youth. They think it's like the free market: if I don't buy any spaghetti sauce because I don't like classic or meaty then eventually someone will fill the gap and get me the chunky sauce I've been wanting. Unfortunately that simply doesn't work in politics.

Once you see it for what it is, a game of tug of war, you realise that you have to play everytime. Even if the current leader doesn't want to go as far as you want every step in the right direction is a victory in itself. It also shifts the center for the next election. You get what you want through steadfast victories over time not through instant change towards an ideal world.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ. "If Biden supports genocide, and you're aligned with Biden, that tells me you support genocide". Is that how your logic works?

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Biden doesn't support genocide. He supports Israel's right to exist, and thinks that they have a right to defend themselves. And even he is saying Israel must start respecting the laws of war or lose US support. You know what Trump said? "Finish the problem". Even on this stupid level, you should be voting Biden because Trump is worse.

So, no, stupid person or Trump plant. That's not how my logic works.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He is materially supporting the genocide. Even you bounce between describing this genocide as "Israel's right to exist" and apologizing for Biden by citing his empty theatrical handwringing over Israel's obvious crimes.

Edit: Honestly, which is it? Is Israel "fighting a just war", or is it " going too far"? If it's "going too far" as Biden is hinting, where and when specifically has it gone too far? More to the point, if Biden doesn't take concrete steps to rein Israel in, what actual difference is there between Biden admin policy and Trump's statement of "finish the job"?

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

*sigh*. Why do I even bother. Oh right, because if I don't, other LIVs will listen to you and buy the bullshit you're selling to weaken Biden and strengthen Trump. So here we go.

Biden is caught between the rock of supporting Israel despite their atrocious behaviours in Gaza and the hard place of either leaving Israel open to being destroyed by other Middle Eastern nations, or allowing Russia to bring Israel into BRICS as part of the anti-USA counter-movement in Russia's and China's desired 'multi-polar' world (and read that to mean the USA is ground under heal and now Russia and China are the new USA, because that's exactly what it means).

Making the hard place even harder is the fact that if Biden were to cancel support for Israel tonight, I guaranfuckingtee you that by tomorrow, Russian-amplified Republican propaganda will be screaming to every person they can reach tomorrow the news that "Biden is an antisemitic puppet for Iran, Saudi Arabia, and every other Islamofascist nation in the Middle East and let innocent Jews die at the hands of the evil Hamas!!!" That could cost him more votes than not giving in to you lot of shitheads calling him a genocidal maniac and losing your votes.

It's NEVER as simple as you lot make it out to be. International politics is nasty, and sometimes, you don't get what you want. But Biden's willing to entertain threatening Israel with a reduction of aid. Trump won't be, and that's on top of every other horrible thing he's outright stated he's going to do. Your blathering over how Biden is killing Muslims over there is going to get a metric fuckton of Muslims, Gays, Minorities, and even Liberals killed here in this fucking country.

So, stupid person or Trump plant, it's STILL not clear why you should vote for anyone else than Biden unless you want Trump to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah the great anonymous source. I'm sure it isn't someone in the democrat campaign! They would never!

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s a source talking to the NYT. If these were journalists with a long track record of deception, then I would raise questions, but the NYT is generally decent.

Anon sources are totally cool, but only if they’re being cited by someone that is trustworthy.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

It’s a source talking to the NYT.

Yes.

If these were journalists with a long track record of deception

Yes.

the NYT is generally decent.

I had a good laugh, thanks!

Anonymous sources aren't totally cool, they are the absolute bottom of the barrel of journalism.

They should absolutely not be used for opinion, and normally need to be backed up by third party evidence.

The AP routinely seeks and requires more than one source when sourcing is anonymous. Stories should be held while attempts are made to reach additional sources for confirmation or elaboration. [...] We must explain in the story why the source requested anonymity. And, when it’s relevant, we must describe the source’s motive for disclosing the information.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think Biden supporters are uhh.. plenty divided. No need for help..

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Not really on basic principles. Just on methods and approaches. There's general agreement that the civilian casualties in Gaza are too high, for instance. The debate is do we try to maintain some influence over Netanyahu to try to sway him, or do we just cut them off and then whatever happens over there is whatever happens, we'd wash our hands of it.

Then the people that go after him more hardcore aren't exactly the strongest "supporters".

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So you support apartheid, you just draw the line at too many dead children?

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Stupid hot-take. Israel has been an ally of the United States for decades. Biden is trying to walk a fine line between maintaining relations with them (despite their current despicable right-wing government, which might not last long, given the huge calls for a new election in Israel) and pressuring them to stop. Trump would gladly suggest paving Gaza over and turning it into a parking lot, and voting for any third-party candidate is identical in result to voting for Trump.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden, who once said "I'm a Zionist, if Israel didn't exist, we'd have to create it" is walking a fine line? Give me a break.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So, if Biden doesn't win, Trump WILL.
What's Trump's plan?
Arm Israel and expand the genocide.

How can you possibly think you have any kind of moral high ground when you're willing to let someone win that will make the problem worse?

This is a literal example of the trolley problem.

If you do nothing and don't vote, millions of children die.
If you vote, thousands of children will die.
But you know who's killing those children?
Benjamin Netanyahu
Yet you fuckers act like Biden is over there doing it with his bare hands.

Get your morals straightened out, because if Trump wins, that blood is on your hands as well as his, and I'd rather only have a little blood of my hands than a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think that few people are Biden supporters and more are "We have to get Biden in so that Trump doesn't get in and hopefully someone younger will come by for the next round but he's still better than the alternative by a mile".

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

We could have elected a shoe into office in 2020 the anti-Trump sentiment was so strong. Its not as strong now, and Biden is a worse candidate than he's ever been.

load more comments
view more: next ›