this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
58 points (91.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43336 readers
766 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I say honor, what I mean is the idea of every individual being called to answer to everyone else. You know, the kind of thing you see from the Klingons. "You are thirty and unmarried, you bring dishonor to us" or "shame on your family for eternity because you were arrested for terrorism" or "what a disgrace you are for not having the skillset of your parents". This goes deeper than that though, sometimes it's more subtle, for example you might run into old classmates and all they want to know is how your brother is doing, or people keep telling you that you should live up to your sister or they might put you in some kind of shadow.

People who defend honor will often say "it is the masses who have spoken, enough said" but do you consider this self-explanatory and why? Because I have many questions sometimes that get no answer that seem to undermine the very justification of honor, for example... what defines a member of an honor culture, is the internet seen as a valid method of manifesting an honor culture, does an honor culture that faces a schism and breaks off from another become a dishonorable honor culture or equally valid, who was the first person to believe in certain ideas from which the honor culture got its conclusions, how did said person justify their ideas, is it dishonorable to find loopholes in the rules of the honor culture, are you dishonored if you save the life of someone who is seppukuing, what if this person happens to be the emperor, etc.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

It's not self explanory. It's strongly tied to a culture or even a person.

I don't see anything bad in not being married nor having different skillet than your parents. Let alone honor being used to kill women and in general justify violence from the powerful to the weak

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Of course not.

Honor is situational, cultural, and often nebulous.

It can't be self explanatory. The closest it gets to that is within a given culture, it can be so engrained as to be learned early enough that it seems self explanatory from within.

I'm normally pretty long winded, but that's really all that needs to be said imo.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When I hear the word "honor" I mostly only conotate it with honor killings where a brother kills his sister or a father his daughter because she dared to date someone they don't approve off. I've not seen it with my own eyes but read about it many articles in Germany and Sweden where Turkish or Afghan migrants did this.

So for me this word has a ver bad conotation.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Expanding on your example I believe "honor" implies that the person doesn't really believe in anything, doesn't have an independent system of morality.
They only care about perception among their in-group.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honor means a lot of different things. And it has been used to commit so many different crimes against minorities.

I think nowadays in the western culture it means individual honor. It means to be trustworthy and to stand by your word. By the classic saying: "A gentleman can settle the bill later".

The way late stage capitalism goes, honor culture will be left behind. Where every individual is reduced to a number, the concept is disappearing. You pay first before pumping gas. And the only time your wow matters is in the court when you say you won't lie.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

Love the western definition meaning integrity. Loathe the definition meaning group pressure up to violence.

[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

imo honor is roughly a synonym for integrity.

yet integrity means different things to different people.

and people also mistake honor and pride.

is it dishonorable to find loopholes in the rules of the honor culture

Dueling culture in 18th and 19th century Europe was commonly organized around concepts of "gentlemanly honor". Even back then, people recognized the need for loopholes.

Consider the case of two friends who got drunk at a tavern, each one declaring how much they loved the other. Eventually, one friend goes overboard "I love you more than you know!" to which the response is "But that cannot be, for my love of you is infinite!". Soon this becomes an argument over who loves the other more, and eventually they have to settle their friendship like gentlemen: With swords at dawn. If they're smart and sober up in time, their seconds will work out a solution before the fight, but there are cases recorded where the friends kill each other because honor trumps love.

There were also loopholes which worked to favor the person that society already deemed more "honorable" (wealthy, connected, liked, etc). It was generally accepted that a gentleman of certain standing could honorably refuse another's challenge to duel if their social stations were different. Think a "new money" banker's son challenging a minor nobleman over a loan that's due. It simply wouldn't look good to have some commoner slaying an aristocrat, even if said aristocrat was an asshole.

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The mere fact that you felt you needed to explain and define it should be proof that the answer is no.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

And I would disagree with OP's definition entirely. What they describe sounds more like reputation or social standing, not honor.

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think honor is living by the rules one sets upon themselves and others. Especially when shit gets hard. It's easy to say "I help people" but it's a lot harder to push a car to the shoulder in the rain because somebody has a flat on a highway. It's also easy to say people should let you in line because you have two items but do you do that when you have a full cart but really want to get home soon? I try to teach my kids "if you can help, you have to help". When they do that, they bring honor to themselves and the family.

Ymmv.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Honor is a social construct which is used to promote "pro-social" behavior. It can be useful in the absence of or in concert with other systems of social control (e.g. laws, religion). Of course, "pro-social" is very much a construct of what the creating society considers to be positive. This can include acting in ways which we, in our current social constructs, would consider "anti-social". Honor ends up getting idolized in media because it often includes an element of self-discipline and self-sacrifice and is usually associated with warrior cultures. Though, it also tends to be conservative and resist changing as social mores change. This has led to some famous consequences as honor based systems tried to cling to social constructs which were no longer tenable. For example, the Satsuma Rebellion saw the existing feudal class seek to maintain it's grip on power in then face of a changing society.

Ultimately, any system of honor would need to be taught to new adherents. It's no different from a religion or legal system in that regard. No one comes out of the womb fully indoctrinated to a system of honor. So no, it isn't really self-explanatory. Like any social construct, you would need to define the system and how it interacts with the society in which is was created. Otherwise, it's just naming a system for social control and hoping no one notices that it's a hollow shell.

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Slave traders were honored guests in lords’ palaces.

I consider honor to sorta be the opposite of hypocrisy. Its to lead ones life as one as one espouses and truly believes and be consistant in word and deed. It is not necessarily good but more often sought by good people.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 1 points 1 month ago

No, and I am honor-bound not to explain it.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To me, honour is being answerable to your duties of being a good citizen. Being honest, being helpful, being civil, having integrity - all that can be part of honour.

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Without meaning to push your buttons, you've defined honour using concepts that have to be further defined to really explain what honour is. Like you could ask what helpful is exactly, would it be helpful to do xyz, etc, and you could argue over it. But then that answers OP's question I suppose by demonstrating that it's not known a priori.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

This makes me think of Jeremy in Pure Pwnage, a mockumentary.

His brother keeps getting gifts from their mom because he has good grades. But Jeremy is instead punished and thrown out of the house.

He feels it's unfair because he is at the top of many game ladders,whereas Kyle is only good with one thing. The guy is basically a kung fu master but there's this shism between the physical and digital worlds, so people just don't get it.

The show explores this shism in various ways, including breaking down this wall entirely, allowing gamers to be powerful in the physical world. Kind of like how coders today are powerful, whereas they used to just be a bunch of nerds.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When I say honor, what I mean is the idea of every individual being called to answer to everyone else.

It was not my will to be alive, but I was brought here anyway

It was never my will to keep living, but I still have to "because reasons"

The fact that I am alive right now is already enough. I don't owe any fuckers anything. You owe me. I answer to myself.

I don't need honor to not rape or kill because I'm not a pscyco, but my life is my own and if you don't like Boo-fucking- hoo

[–] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

Honor is a sense of a child doing things for which parents will praise them. An adult substitutes parents with other people and institutions, but honor is still a desire to be accepted and praised by others and anticipation of it.