I mean, if you flip it over and look at the legs it's kind of crabby looking.
CrimeDad
Phone through one half of binoculars. Best I could do!
They don't have to sell hydrogen or solar panels. They'll just keep selling fuel to power plants.
That's a lot of future e-waste to lug around just for cooking.
Their days aren't numbered until governments actually say so. In the meantime, non-GHG emitting sources supply less than half of the world's electricity as is, nevermind the hypothetical demand of a predominantly electrified vehicle fleet.
Unfired pressure vessels are already pretty common common in industrial, commercial, healthcare, transport, and recreational settings. I am comfortable with continuing to trust the engineers as the portion of these vessels that contain hydrogen increases.
Fossil fuels, including coal, are also used to produce electricity. They simply need to be prohibited or at least strictly rationed. Fortunately, hydrogen can be produced without emitting greenhouse gasses because it is still necessary for processes like steel and fertilizer production. It's also a practical replacement for fossil fuels in transportation and, as Toyota demonstrated, food preparation. As I replied to someone else, sometimes we need portability and/or a flame when it comes to cooking. Electricity just doesn't cut it in those cases.
If these are serious concerns for you, I'm sure you will always be able to find plug in electric grills on the market.
What's so exotic about a composite pressure vessel? They're already used in scuba and paintball.
I don't understand this suspicion. It's easier to burn fossil fuels for electricity than to reform them into hydrogen.
It's an important ingredient for the safety of injectable drugs and the crabs are returned to the sea alive. If a synthetic alternative takes off, I am concerned that the government will not care as much about protecting this species.