this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
184 points (97.4% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

753 readers
200 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Great, now go after the buyers.

Some local fast food franchise owner knew enough to not ask questions about discount meat being sold from a school district van.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Did she sell them? The article doesn't say she did.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally hundreds of tons of chicken wings. Imagine 10 trucks full.

I don’t think she ate them all.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know she's not going to be eating at home for a while

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Technically, she will be, just not the home she would prefer.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What would you do with 1.5 million in chicken besides eating a little and selling the rest.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

chicken throne.

chicken pool.

then eat some.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You could literally eat like a millionaire for a while so long as you have a few deep freezers.

Realistically, she filled her freezer and sold a ton of them for 25¢ on the dollar to other people who filled their freezer and sold them off for 50¢ on the dollar.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wouldn't know, but somehow I doubt millionaires eat $1.5 million worth of school cafeteria grade chicken.

And without digging into it, I bet it's far more than a few deep freezers worth.

[–] bighatchester@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You could fit 11000 cases of wings in a few deep freezers if you tried hard enough.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The joke is she had a net worth of over $1.5m due to the value of the chicken, so eating anything would be eating like a millionaire.

A chicken wing is a chicken wing and it don't matter if you got $5 or $5 million. I know for a fact that I would still eat Totino's pizza(pizza that is like $1.50 per.) if I were a billionaire

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fair, I get ya now

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

The articles doesn’t say anything about what happened to the chicken

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is a FUCK TON of chicken wings.

Alexa tells me the wholesale price of chicken wings is $3.22 a pound and each pound is around 5 wings.

So $1.5m / $3.22 = 465,838.5 pounds of wings.
2,329,193 wings.

What did they charge her with? "Possession with intent to distribute"? LOL.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have to assume they’re calculating the menu price of those wings. Then it's only ~2k lbs

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Well, it's a school, so no menu pricing.

[–] TTH4P@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ain't no thing but 3,960,000 chicken wings

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Chicken Wing cost about 1.5million bling bling

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Raking food out of the mouths of hungry kids. What a piece of subhuman garbage.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Intended for remote learners? What?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

when the wings were meant for children doing remote learning but who were still picking up school meals

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Think for a moment about the kids who don't eat a school meal because it's convenient but because they have to, for one reason or another. Now imagine stealing from their budget.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Imagine stealing chicken wings from anyone.

That shit is fucked.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Satan, don't be so helpful, people might get the wrong idea about you

[–] Leeks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Harvey is a very economically depressed area. There’s a good chance that if the school didn’t feed the kids during Covid, the kids would have gone hungry.

[–] we_avoid_temptation@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

It was the second paragraph.

Vera Liddell, the food service director for Harvey School District 152 near Chicago, stole the huge amount of fast food during the pandemic and its aftermath, when the wings were meant for children doing remote learning but who were still picking up school meals, local TV station WGN reported.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What I want to know is what the hell did she do with that many chicken wings? She can't have sold them... She took them on a case-by-case basis.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

She sold them.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

i'm wondering the same thing; $1.5 million is A LOT of chicken wings!!!

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Wtf did she do with 11,000 cases of wings?

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not that weird. Grab the wings with public money, sell them to some fast food chain with low standards and win a lot of money. Oh! And "fuck poor kids!".

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably independently owned and operated, non-franchised restaurants. Fast food franchisees generally aren't around the day to day operations and are contractually obligated to buy supplies from the franchise. But it's not impossible that one is dumb enough or desperate enough to do something like that.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What a despicable crime. She stole them from needy school kids; they were intended to feed kids in low-income areas during lockdown.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Seems a bit harsh tbh

Edit: I'm copying in a response from further down the thread to hopefully centralize things rather than having multiple similar responses in multiple multiple places

It isn't about the severity of the crime.

Non violent crime being punished by jail time does nothing useful. It doesn't for drug crimes, for prostitution, for theft, for anything.

I'm kinda amazed that lemmy of all places is so against the idea of criminal justice reform.

Either the system does something useful, or it needs changing. If jail time has a point other than fucking up the life of the criminal, I sure as hell can't see it for non violent crime. Even for some violent crime, chances are that the criminal would have a better chance of being reformed by other methods than plain segregation from society, but at least that can claim to be a benefit by virtue of preventing the criminal from being violent at large.

IDGAF about who someone steals from, what they stole, or why. I care about making the best effort to A: reduce the chances of it happening again, and B: having the thief making restitution in one way or another. Jail achieves neither of those.

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know, she stole food meant for low income kids. That's appallingly immoral in my book. For a lot of kids, the meals they get at (or in this case from) school are the only meals they may get, and I'm positive the pandemic didn't improve that situation for a lot of people.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This was organized crime by a corrupt school official. This isn't petty crime. So I don't think this situation is one of those that "does nothing useful" to have severe consequences. Additionally, your dismissal of the circumstances around the crime seems odd. This person stole from the most vulnerable where restitution isn't possible because we don't have time machines and they stole an amount that restitution is beyond the means of the thief without further commiting theft or fraud.

Jail is the best option here. I think the sentencing could be lighter and the parole and probation system should be fixed, but there's not much better to be done in a scenario like this.

Also I think making kids starve constitues violence.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago

Does nobody read articles?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If someone stole $1.5m from a bank they'd probably get similar or more

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Probably, but I still think that's a bit much if it wasn't armed robbery

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally causing the starvation of hungry children used to be punished by mob beating to death. I think she is getting of quite lightly, and will probably make a profit when she gets out in like two years and does a right wing media circus tour.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The mistakes of the past being used as an excuse to keep making lesser mistakes is pretty damn lame.

Does the sentence do anything other than make people feel better because it's punishment?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it’s also important for you to understand the context that a non-violent woman is unlikely to serve more than a third of her initial sentence which is where these numbers come from.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a good thing, not a bad one. But my objection still stands. It's a harsh sentence for a non violent crime. Which, if harsh sentences did any good, I wouldn't object. But they don't.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How would you handle someone that intentionally starved thousands of children? It’s not like this was some broke starving person stealing a tampon, they had a stable, well paying executive job and made an intentional choice.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Hyperbole isn't useful either.

This was not literal starvation. Shitty, underhanded, and illegal, but not starvation. If you're going to insist on exaggerating the issue, please don't bother me.

I'll say it again, it doesn't matter what the non violent crime is, you make the justice about fixing what they did. I'm not sure where in the thread I said it, but I suggested a decade of community service working in the very program stolen from, under heavy supervision.