this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
180 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For my entire lifetime, there's been an obvious trend of Republicans absolutely fucking the economy and then Democrats cleaning up the mess. Anybody who trusts trump more than Harris in this topic is incapable of pattern recognition, even if trump were "one of the good ones" if you believe such a thing exists. It just so happens that he is particularly terrible on every topic, including the economy, but even if he weren't, any modern Republican would still be poison for the American economy.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

People are just extremely ideologically divided. Many Republicans may not be particularly fond of Trump, but he's their only choice if they want to stay true to their ideology. So they end up defending his economic policies either way. One of the many "blessings" of a two-party system.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, disclaimer that polls are shit and should always be taken with a truckload of salt, BUT...

It's interesting that half-ish of the people in the "neither" camp seem to have jumped to Biden/Harris, and half-ish of the "neither" camp has stayed exactly where they were. Trump's support is totally frozen, and trust in Dems has increased every month since February except right after the debate debacle. We certainly shouldn't draw sweeping conclusions from one data point, but this does lend support to the argument that Biden was singularly weighing the ticket down amid otherwise pretty solid fundamentals.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most of the increase for Harris is probably Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents who were dissatisfied with Biden at the top of the ticket. But they probably would have voted for Biden regardless. This move minimizes the risk that these voters wouldn't show up to vote. Very good sign for Democrats.

There probably just isn't much more than 41-42 percent to get for Republicans at this point.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

"Voters trust Harris more than Trump"

Fixed the headline.