this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
117 points (93.3% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4547 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/APyQY

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Worst three weeks...

... so far

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 25 points 1 month ago

We can only hope.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Although this is a Simpsons meme joke, it's a joke with some truth to it, and I suspect things indeed will get even worse for Trump, and no it's not before it gets better, because it won't.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I've always wondered when that moment would come where people just got tired of his shit. Never had much hope until these last couple weeks. With the benefit of some hindsight we may look back at one of these recent events as the tipping point.

Even still - remember 2016 that anything can happen, remember Jan 6 and the depths these losers will go - and VOTE.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Let's be fair, it's also his worst three weeks of his year and that includes getting 34 felony charges and nearly assassinated but he's losing it over the possibility of losing to Kamala Harris. His Nazi ass ego just can't handle that possibility.

With luck, this'll be topped in November so he needent worry. The worst is yet to come.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A week before the Hamptons fund-raiser, on July 25, Mr. Trump stunned one of his wealthiest patrons, Miriam Adelson, the widow of the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, by having an aide, Natalie Harp, fire off a series of angry text messages to Mrs. Adelson in Mr. Trump’s name, according to three people with knowledge of what took place.

The texts were particularly jarring because Mrs. Adelson and Mr. Trump had a friendly meeting just a week earlier at the Republican National Convention, according to a person briefed on the matter. The texts complained about the people running Mrs. Adelson’s super PAC, Preserve America, into which she is pouring millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump.

At the time, Preserve America was spending nearly $18 million on a week’s worth of ads aiding Mr. Trump in three battleground states. The texts said that the officials running Preserve America were “RINOs” — Republicans in name only — and that Mrs. Adelson’s late husband would never have tolerated that, the people said.

According to two of the people, aides to Mrs. Adelson later discovered that the outburst against her had been encouraged by another major Trump donor, Ike Perlmutter, the former chairman of Marvel Entertainment, who had hoped in vain that Mrs. Adelson would contribute to a rival super PAC that he backs.

They are starting to eat their own.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

When you help a campaign based on a race to the bottom, always expect to be a casualty on the way down.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

Though I remain cautious because anything can happen, I do enjoy his flailing in public and humiliating himself.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/10/us/politics/trump-campaign-election.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support