this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2228 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 100 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Okay, I think we need to recalibrate ourselves a little bit. I mean even if this potato quality picture was real, it would obviously have been put up by people opposing him, and there's nothing really surprising or shocking about something like that.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, there is a barcode. Got a scanner?

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I reposted it anyway. It’s the truth.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A classic case of couchfucking

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 3 months ago

"My body, your chaise"

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Don't think there's enough pixels.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is that a legitimate question?

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

No kidding this is fake as hell.

Media literacy in the us is just piss poor.

However, this would be a good attack ad.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

WTF? People can have the choice? THEY TOOK AWAY OUR CHOICE! I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I HATE HIM!!!

Sorry about that. Thanks for the vent.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Say it louder! Fucking America used to be about freedom!

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're certainly fucking America...

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

He is so full of shit. How is something that was previously considered a universal right somehow made better for citizens when it is then handled at the state level? And his leaving the door open for federal restrictions is him admitting this. He has to regret what he and his Supreme Court have done to his own electability.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 17 points 3 months ago

"the virus will be gone by summer."

[–] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Sure, you can do things that will supplement [state's abortion bans]. Absolutely. And those things are pretty open, and humane, but you have to be able to have a vote, and all I want to do is give everybody a vote, and the votes are taking place right now as we speak.

Mixing in some garbled response about voting in what should otherwise be a straightforward response tells you everything you need. His addled brain betrays his real stance: "I'll go with whatever gets me the most votes, I don't give a shit about the actual issue".

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No no, see - here's the media under reporting. again. He also said "abortion is a settled issue" "everyone is happy" "no one's talking about that any more".

This verbiage is a more telling perspective than "small issue".

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

he believes abortion will be a “small issue” in the November elections now that the power to ban abortion is in the hands of state lawmakers, but added that he is open to federal restrictions on abortion that would “supplement” state policy.

So, "state's rights" for Republican states to remake The Handmaiden's Tale, with federal "supplements" to force Democratic states into the same cage.

A reporter asked Trump if, for example, he would use presidential power to restrict access to one of the drugs commonly used in medication abortion. His answer left observers guessing as to whether Trump was open to restricting mifepristone, which is used in about two-thirds of abortions, or simply didn’t understand what he was being asked.

If you re-read the first quote, its pretty fucking obvious he's more than open to restricting it. It's probably one of the first things he'd do, to punish people and states that don't support him.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Trumps dick is a small issue