this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7642 readers
1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I might not be understanding something about the fediverse, but isn't this like if you couldn't send or receive email from a friend because you use gmail Google decided to block @icloud domains?

Like, you're not forced to follow or interact with it, and are free to block it if you can think of a reason to, I just don't see why such an open platform used to limit users in this way

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheOneCurly@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The concept as I understand it is that Threads has the sheer volume of content to completely drown out the existing Fedi content if it fully opens the floodgates. If that occurs and say 90% of content becomes Threads and then they start making Threads only extensions to Activity Pub, servers will have to start patching those in and the Activity Pub project is defacto owned by Meta.

People also have issues with the Meta content moderation and the population on Threads, but as you noted that's fixable on an individual and community level. The existential threat to the future of the Fediverse is why servers should defederate. Meta can't and shouldn't be trusted with any amount of power over this community project.

[–] placatedmayhem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is called "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish". Microsoft coined the term internally for their responses to open standards in the 90's and 00's.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lemmy World is doing a pretty good job of that themselves. I don't hate them, but I don't understand why.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, they aren't. They aren't by any means.

Maybe there are more posts from that instance, but there is no one trying to then extend the protocol with the objective of requesting special features and then killing off the protocol.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They haven't gone that far yet, but they're on their way. I didn't think they were like that in the beginning either, but they certainly were advertising themselves to be the best place to go in the beginning for some unknown reason. They now try and take over every community and/or shut down smaller ones. An admin was curating things, which isn't a great sign. Granted, it was just an admin, but I'm not welcome there anymore. They act like reddit, so I think of them like reddit. That's just my take, you're totally welcome to disagree, and you obviously do. I didn't see the value in spreading out in the fediverse, now I do.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

didn’t see the value in spreading out in the fediverse, now I do.

Welcome to the other instances!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

I don’t want to interact with anything related to that company. There’s a reason I don’t have accounts on any of their platforms. I don’t like them.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

I simply don’t trust Meta. That’s all.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

For me it's just "fuck Meta." Fuck that company for coming here.

[–] nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

All the arguments were had here: https://sh.itjust.works/post/11011288

edit: and the subsequent vote where we decided to defederate: https://sh.itjust.works/post/11308397

[–] Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I went to fedi to avoid big corporations and what they've done with social media. Why would I want their platform having access to my posts? I don't trust meta or any of the other big tech companies. In fact, the main mastodon instance I use blocks threads entirely and that's one of the reasons I joined it.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the argument is that Meta would hoover up and profit from posts from people who don't consent to use it. AFAIK, you can't block an instance from seeing your posts and comments, so the only real option is defederation.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can't block anything from seeing your posts and comments though. That is point of a free and public space. Defederation isn't doing what you think it is

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, websites could scrape and whatnot, but having actual API integration is a very different thing.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

only until llm scrapers hit the market. they will make the api requirement negligible. like reddit is finding out now... you can block your api all you want but people are just going to scrape your public site.

Sure, but that's not the issue at all. The issue is that they'd be linking lemmy content from within Threads, as in using Lemmy content to drive engagement for Threads. Whether it's used in an LLM is another matter entirely. Without direct API integration, Lemmy posts and comments won't show up in Threads. That's my take on why people want to defederate.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is exactly it. these people are posting public information, and are then getting butt-hurt when its used a public resource.

im running an mbin instance (shoutout https://moist.catsweat.com !), which does connect to threads. I purposefully avoided using lemmy as its not capable of doing that. I wanted to give people stuck in the FB walled garden a path out where they could still communicate with their friends and family on threads.

my only concern with threads is one of resource management/volume. I cant have their stream physically take down my server, so that would be the only reason for me to block them.

a rather large lemmy contingent are vehemently, emotionally anti-meta. see also the 'fedipact'

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

a rather large lemmy contingent are vehemently, emotionally anti-meta.

Meta's history doesn't really speak in its favor

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Facebook bad.

Yes that's my whole take.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

This is all you need.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because fuck facebook and its ten other names and fuck zuckerberg too

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Fascist-adjacent.

Overwhelmingly large.

E-mail does not work the same way.

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 0 points 1 month ago

Lots of people love to defederate anything at the drop of a hat.

That's it.

In reality, threads and lemmy aren't even the same type of thing and are unlikely to intersect on a regular basis, in the same way you don't see many posts from mastodon or pleroma.

One thing I find funny about the whole thing is meta is a bunch of corpos, so it isn't that hard to just get them to defederate from you if you're willing to grow a spine. My network is blocked, and I believe it's because I called the maintainer of fediblock a nazi gestapo a bunch of times and demanded they add my site to their list of wrongthinkers or I'd call them doubleplus ungood, thus getting on a list that mindless drones use because it's easier to just follow orders, regardless of where those orders come from.

lol

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a lot of reactionary anti-corpo types here. There's really no good reason for users to want to defederate from a Facebook owned instance. It's also a pointless stance, as threads is a Twitter/mastodon style site and not really compatible with reddit/lemmy style sites.

There are some technical reasons to avoid federating for those hosting instances. The software forces local copies of everything users subscribe to which is a massive space concern. There's also a problem with performance of syncing that data for large instances that's already a problem with .world size instances, where it can take a day+ to process new comments.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There’s really no good reason for users to want to defederate from a Facebook owned instance.

Yeah why would anyone object to a company that manipulated people for the fascist who tried to overthrow the US government, and recently hired a co-author of Project 2025? 'You just don't like it!'

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

That's a reson to not subscribe or participate, not defederate.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well, this was extremely disappointing. Only one person had a helpful reply, pointing to this link explaining the basics, a couple others vaguely gestured about their distaste of Meta, and everyone else demonstrated an even lesser understanding of the fediverse than I had started with. One particular flat-earther just called me a slag and posted a screenshot of themselves downvoting all my comments.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This discussion has happened several times over the last few months, people are probably over it.

The thread that was linked has 119 comments if you want more opinions on the topic.

If you want other threads

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or people checked your comment history and saw that your first ever comment was to vote against defederation, and you haven't done anything besides drop pseud-posts whenever people expressed their desire not to federate with Threads. That does not look like good faith engagement to me.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Username checks out

[–] stembolts@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"Everyone disagrees with me, that is insane because I am clearly smarter than them all. Why won't all you idiot people agree with me?!"

All of your comments in one reductive nutshell.

You seem to have low self-awareness. Do you happen to be autistic?

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

When did anyone disagree with me? Using "autistic" as a pejorative is more revealing oof your character than mine. Good luck!

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You understand perfectly well.

This is not genuine discource. You post in bad faith with a tactic as old as Reddit. Piss off slag.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What? Let me guess, you're a flat earther too?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

These are seasoned ex-redditors here, do you think trying to antagonize them is going to work? Move along.