sh.itjust.works Main Community

7688 readers

7 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

Can someone explain why so many people here are FOR blocking Threads.net on a server level? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 months ago by Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I might not be understanding something about the fediverse, but isn't this like if you couldn't send or receive email from a friend because you use gmail Google decided to block @icloud domains?

Like, you're not forced to follow or interact with it, and are free to block it if you can think of a reason to, I just don't see why such an open platform used to limit users in this way

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that's not the issue at all. The issue is that they'd be linking lemmy content from within Threads, as in using Lemmy content to drive engagement for Threads. Whether it's used in an LLM is another matter entirely. Without direct API integration, Lemmy posts and comments won't show up in Threads. That's my take on why people want to defederate.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

so youre saying meta may use the information youre publicly posting as if it was public information?

e. solution seems simple. require login to view content... or dont

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I'm saying it's a completely separate concern. Whether Meta scrapes lemmy has nothing to do with whether Meta is federated with lemmy.