this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1553 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

11217 readers
2544 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 366 points 3 months ago (11 children)

The TSA is something that shouldn't exist in its current form. They very often fail their audit checks and normalize invading your privacy to an extreme degree like body scanners and pat downs. If water bottles are considered potentially explosive then why dump them on a bin next to a line of people where they can go off? This is low grade security theater that inconveniences passengers at best.

[–] leisesprecher 115 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's security theater through and through.

Apart from the obvious failings of these checks, think about what kind of damage a single backpack of explosives can do to a packed airport during holiday season. You can literally put a ton of explosives on one of those trolleys, roll it into the waiting area and kill 200 people easily. No security whatsoever involved.

Reality is, most security measures are designed to keep the illusion of control. Nothing more. Penetration testers show again and again that you can easily circumvent practically all barriers or measures.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 20 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The goal is not to stop the people in the queue being attacked, its to stop someone boarding a plane with the means to hijack it

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They fail gloriously at at that too.

Whenever they get tested the red teams manage to smuggle in everything needed to hijiack a plane plus a kitchen sink.

The few times that terrorists tried to board planes, they made it through security and were caught by other passengers.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (5 children)

That's what's changed. Before, a hijacking meant a free trip to south America or Cuba. Now it means you're likely to die if you don't stop the hijackers. A planeful of pissed off passengers determined to live are gonna stop a would-be hijacker.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Liz@midwest.social 21 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Yeah, and you don't need the TSA for that. Just do as they already do: lock the cockpit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They had to do something about the plague of people hijacking planes with bottles of water.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 93 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's basically the only type of jobs program that both sides of our broken government can agree on: petty nonsense that looks like it might do something useful, but really doesn't, and only inconveniences the poors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The main reason that rule still exists is to sell overpriced water. Otherwise they could just ask you to drink some of it to prove it's water.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

you are allowed to take empty bottles with you, just saying

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Some airports have no place to refill and have only hot water in the toilet sinks. It's inhumane.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This happened to me after a lunch break going back into the court room for jury duty. Didn't think about my soda until I got to the checkpoint, used to the TSA's mentality so figured the rest of it was forfeit. She just tells me to take a drink to show it's valid. Respect for people doing their job correctly, and using common sense.

[–] fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 months ago (9 children)

According to the story I heard as to the origin of the "no liquids over X amount" rule, years ago there was a terrorist that tried to smuggle hydrogen peroxide and acetone - which can be used to rather easily synthesize triacetone triperoxide (TATP, a highly sensitive explosive) - onto a plane in plastic toiletry bottles. They got caught and foiled somehow, and then the TSA started restricting liquids on planes. This was in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, if I recall correctly.

And I happen to know, from a reliable source, of someone who accidentally made TATP in a rotary evaporator in an academic lab. So it seems plausible.

Not that the rule is actually effective prevention against similar attacks, nor that the TSA even knows what the reason is behind what they do at this point, haha. I just thought it was an interesting story.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago

It's because all the shops inside want you to buy their shit.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The main reason why it exists is to provide jobs. The number of people who work at the TSA at every airport in every state...no representative wants to cut those jobs.

[–] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 3 months ago (18 children)

I fucking hate that this is a thing. "We can't stop doing this useless and/or detrimental thing, look at all the work it makes for other people to do!!!" Absolutely bonkers that it's just a standard political argument.

[–] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. I’d rather they be paid that wage NOT to bother me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I mean if a state removed the TSA and spent the money on something else, surely they could use the money to create as many jobs as they removed but in an actual useful field.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Could we pay them to dig a ditch and fill it back in again? It'd be just as useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 126 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 178 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Big caveat

The final decision rests with the TSA officer on whether an item is allowed through the checkpoint.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 132 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Ah yes, the "rules only apply when I say they do" rule. Much legitimate.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 23 points 3 months ago

See, flying isn't for people who plan. It's for people who roll 20s and not 1s. You know, lucky people. That's the message here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mercuri@lemmy.world 126 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's actually stated on the TSA website that frozen liquids are permitted. https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/items/ice

[–] stalfoss@lemm.ee 75 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Notice the footnote on every TSA webpage that their officers can always change the rules on the spot if they feel like it. So it’s always a gamble.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is what gets me the most. It's totally arbitrary, every time it's a chance for new rules. What you brought one way maybe a problem on your way home.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 119 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The longer they discuss the less it is allowed.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup, TSA is on the same level as McDonald's. You're arguing with a dipshit who hates you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zwiebel 94 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Do you think they get mad if I bring plasma

[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As long as it's being held in magnetic confinement!

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They tend not to care so much about "how safely the hazardous material is stored"

Just ask anyone who's tried to smuggle on 5lbs of mercury...

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, that's because five pounds would be about 6 fluid ounces of mercury and you're only allowed 3 ounces of a fluid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I'm full of plasma, but they never stopped me from flying.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 91 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically it's the only kind of correct. Technically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StThicket@reddthat.com 72 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've actually done this successfully. TSA agent knocked on it, and said no problem.

If i somehow would be stopped, I'd love to argue what is liquid or not, and what could be liquid if it's just hot enough.

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Getting denied at security because you’re trying to bring steel beams

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's odd...I've had TSA agents recommend this to get liquids through security.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (11 children)

you could freeze H2O2 and blow up something later.

[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago

The main issue you'll have with the TSA in this case is that you're using logic

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ma11ie@lemmy.one 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

For the lazy:

Ice

Carry On Bags: Yes (Special Instructions)

Checked Bags: Yes

Frozen liquid items are allowed through the checkpoint as long as they are frozen solid when presented for screening. If frozen liquid items are partially melted, slushy, or have any liquid at the bottom of the container, they must meet 3-1-1 liquids requirements

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

I brought frozen fish with ice packs through TSA. The TSA guy was a fisherman and wanted to talk about fishing.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Recently, I'm flying quite a lot, so I must try it, just to see if it works.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

On my last trip I had a full water bottle with me and the lady said I had to throw it away, so I looked her dead in the eye while I chugged the entire bottle and stuffed the bottle in my bag.

Fuckin tell me I can't bring the water through again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

TSA vs Karen, quite a match

load more comments
view more: next ›