this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
129 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

1163 readers
340 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Another device heads to the Google graveyard.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And just like that I gave up on casting and shifted back to a dedicated streaming PC like it's 2010. I changed the way I consumed my media for you, Google, and your thanks in return was betraying us by retiring the equipment that we came to rely on left and right. I'm still pissed about Chromecast audio.

God I'm tired of this shit.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

They've done this so many times now, one of these days we'll know better

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

Chromecast audio

When they disco'd them I found like 6 at Walmart for 3.99.

I bought them all. Lol

They are still in a box... But Ill have a use for them... Probably

[–] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

So tired...

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In place of the Chromecast, the company will offer the newly announced $99.99 Google TV Streamer, which launches on September 24th. The set-top box comes with some significant spec bumps over the Chromecast with Google TV, such as a processor that’s 22 percent faster, along with Thread and Matter integration.

Replacing it with something 3x as much that more or less does the same thing.

[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was already considering Jellyfin as a possible replacement, and this pretty much ensures it.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So what will you use as your Jellyfin client then? Roku?

[–] tyler@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Roku is fucking terrible now. I’m not who you asked but I switched off of Roku to an Apple TV and it’s by far the best device you can use unless you’re building something completely custom.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just to clarify, the Jellifin app for Roku is pretty good and has been improving a ton the last year in particular. But yeah, Roku itself is it's own can of worms

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Oh sorry, yeah. No clue about the app but Roku is in the shitter as far as I’m concerned.

[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Dunno. I've come to rely on the "cast" functionality from my Android, but finding a FOSS client with even similar functionality is proving difficult.

Chromecast will continue to work, until it doesn't. I'll use that time to test some options and see where I land.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google & Microsoft went to the same college. They create devices, make people think there will be multiple generations of these devices, and in a short time, DELETE them from Earth. Same for services. If you have a complaint about my opinion, you can contact me on Google+

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's weird is that Google + actually had a lot of traction. They could have been serious competitors to Facebook, especially now that Facebook has completely fucked their site.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They completely screwed that up. Some of us never joined StalkerBook and never will. I think the real reason Google stops doing things is because they can't make bazillions doing it. Billions are just not enough for them. Greedy, greedy, greedy.

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the reason they drop these things is that the project leaders move on and one one wants to take that job anymore. If there is no one to push it, no one cares and it gets axed. The person that setup Google+ probably wasn't around after it launched, so momentum was just completely lost.

Calling them greedy gives them more credit than the apathy they had to begin with.

[–] Saeveo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I remember reading somewhere that this happens because people within Google are only credited for bringing new products/projects to fruition. There's no benefit career-wise to maintaining or improving a product, so once it's up and running you pull your team away from it ASAP to start working on something new.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago

The Google grave yard:

1000002751

[–] floppybanana@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Specs for thhe replacement are similar to the Onn 4k Pro but almost double the price...

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Onn is a great brand

[–] nailingjello@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone with an OG Chromecast and occasionally uses it to cast photos, any reason I should find a recently discontinued "last model" to replace mine?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Only if you need 4k HDR.

I feel like the constant renaming carousel hurts google more than a lot of people realize. Most people buying streaming devices don't pay attention to press releases. The Chromecast name has a ton of recognition that now disappeared, and "Google Streamer" is too generic ever to get traction.

Also the processor sucks. It was used in the fire stick in 2021. 99$ for something that isn't gonna be some huge improvement over the $50 device.