this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024

287 points (98.3% liked)

News

22839 readers

3655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

287

ABC host reportedly received death threats after Trump interview (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

ABC News’s senior congressional correspondent Rachel Scott has reportedly faced threats to her life after her piercing interview of Donald Trump at the National Association of Black Journalists convention left the former president fuming.

The NABJ’s executive director told members at a meeting on Saturday that “Scott had received death threats following her work asking incisive questions of … Trump at the group’s national convention” three days earlier, Eric Deggans of National Public Radio wrote in an X post published Saturday.

…

Scott asked Trump on Wednesday, “Why should Black voters trust you?” given his history of inflammatory comments about Black people. Among other questions, she also quizzed him about whether he believed Vice-President Kamala Harris had risen to the top of the Democratic ticket for November’s White House election solely “because she is a Black woman”.

top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Trump's magat terrorists at work. How dare you ask slightly difficult questions of their dear leader?!

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

You don't understand... she was RUDE to him! How was she rude? She asked him to clarify comments he's made in the past! Can you imagine the nerve?!?

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It doesn't matter what the question is because he'll never answer it anyway.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Brown shirt bootlickers

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I can just imagine the spittle flying from the full lipped, meaty jowled, flushed faces of his most rabid white boy supporters as they scream in their shrill voices that a woman has no place questioning their president.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is death threats even special anymore?

I made a reddit post pointing out an “advocacy group’s” fraudulent actions and the director of said group sent me multiple death threats and fake legal letters lol

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which one?

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Long Covid Action Project. Which is full of misinformation and bullshit and reallt harms the long covid community.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Amazing that they recognize how awful that interview went, but still think it's the interviewers' fault for asking him questions and not Trump's fault for being a belligerent idiot.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If they scare her away, wouldn’t they effectively be taking away a “black job”?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/04/trump-interview-nabj-abc-host

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[+] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

US politics is toxic because it is divisive

two parties have hijacked our elections and created football politics that pit one side against the other

should be different voices with multiple different representators in government just like the voters if all were allowed to vote

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

two parties have hijacked our elections and created football politics that pit one side against the other

THaeYRe baSICALLLY ThE SA aME!

[+] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works -9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Political parties should be abolished. Imagine how much more attention you would have yo pay if you had to understand who to vote for. Plus then it would allow people like your local mail carrier to run for things like school committee.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Political parties should be abolished.

How?

Imagine how much more attention you would have yo pay if you had to understand who to vote for.

Bring back the old literacy tests while you're at it.

Plus then it would allow people like your local mail carrier to run for things like school committee.

They aren't? If yes how would that change?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

How?

Good question. I said should, not could... it would take a constitutional change, which is currently impossible. I used to think a lot about this, and there just is no law that wouldn't get stricken down if passed.

Bring back the old literacy tests while you're at it

Pfft. The two are not the same. You could be perfectly illiterate and still find out what the supposed values of the politicians were by simply listening to them, or just talking to others about policy and politicians ties to them, like we used to.

They aren't? If yes how would that change?

The Hatch Act applies to all career federal civil servants and prevents anyone under that designation from running from office in any partisan race. Meaning if your local government doesn't allow political affiliations to be listed, then you can run for dog catcher or school committee or whatever. Non-partisan local elections used to be the norm, now they are exceptionally rare. Forcing every election to be non-partisan opens up a bunch of likely trustworthy people to be able participate in politics through running for offices.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How?

Good question. I said should, not could... it would take a constitutional change, [...]

I mean: if you had the power, how would you ban parties? At what point do political organizations become parties? How about individual representatives working together?

Bring back the old literacy tests while you're at it

Pfft. The two are not the same. You could be perfectly illiterate and still find out what the supposed values of the politicians were by simply listening to them, or just talking to others about policy and politicians ties to them, like we used to.

Yes literacy is not the deciding factor, but it was always a pretense to keep certain people from voting.

Imagine how much more attention you would have yo pay if you had to understand who to vote for.

How much time should a person spend following politics to get enough of an understanding? What about poor people working long hours with little free time?
Guess I should have gone with the landowning requirement instead.

The Hatch Act applies to all career federal civil servants and prevents anyone under that designation from running from office in any partisan race. Meaning if your local government doesn't allow political affiliations to be listed, then you

Sound like a problem with the Hatch Act, not with political parties. Over here civil servant can run in political races as long they separate their work and political live, they are not allowed to wear uniforms at political events for example.