this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
447 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign on Sunday is launching “Republicans for Harris” as she looks to win over Republican voters put off by Donald Trump’s candidacy.

The program will be a “campaign within a campaign,” according to Harris’ team, using well-known Republicans to activate their networks, with a particular emphasis on primary voters who backed former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley. The program will kick off with events this week in Arizona, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. Republicans backing Harris will also appear at rallies with the vice president and her soon-to-be-named running mate this coming week, the campaign said.

The Harris campaign shared the details of the program first with The Associated Press before the official announcement.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 161 points 1 month ago
[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good. This is some bipartisanship I can appreciate. I hope Mike Pence endorses her, he could give a statement like "y'know, there was this one day they all wanted to hang me..."

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Vice presidents keepin it real

🤜🤛

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

He can’t talk to Harris unless his wife is with him though.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Mike Pence is fucking gross though. Didn't deserve to be hanged but still.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Excellent idea. Many of us disagree with Republicans, but many Republicans aren’t villains who want a bigoted dictator in the White House. They don’t want to be condescended to, either, and that’s fair. Nobody likes that.

The best way to win them over is with other Republicans who want to preserve democracy.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The best way to win them over is with other Republicans who want to preserve democracy.

That's a funny way of saying "former Republicans." By definition, anyone who wants to preserve democracy can no longer be a member of the Republican Party because they are directly at odds with 100% of its platform and ideology.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of people have a political party woven into their identity. It's hard for them to accept that their party is no longer aligned with their views. If they still identify as Republicans but oppose Trump, they might just avoid confronting the cognitive dissonance by staying home or writing in a candidate for president. Plenty of others will pinch their nose and vote Trump because they just can't escape seeing it as R vs D.

By appealing to them as Republicans, the Harris campaign is able to basically say that it's ok, you don't have to choose between being a Republican and voting against the insurrectionist would-be dictator.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

You're not wrong, tactically speaking about the current election, but at some point afterwards we've got quit enabling their denial and start helping them through the rest of those stages of grief.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s what it’s become. A lot of people who voted for Trump the first time won’t do it again, because they thought the warnings and predictions were exaggerated. Oops.

Now, we’ve got a Republican Party that’s painted itself into a corner, because they let themselves become overrun by fascists. Former Republicans need to come to terms with that.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Now, we’ve got a Republican Party that’s painted itself into a corner, because they let themselves become overrun by fascists.

I mean, yes, but also no: it's not so much that they've "let themselves become overrun" and more "willingly given in to their basest desires."

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just give em the benefit of the doubt that they are really just conservatives, who may be misguided, but who are generally still operating in good faith, unlike the Trumpists simply looking to seize power and abuse it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Just give em the benefit of the doubt that they are really just conservatives, who may be misguided, but who are generally still operating in good faith

That's always been a fiction. The word for people who believe in things like democracy and the rule of law has always been some variety of "liberal."

Conservatism -- yes, true conservatism -- is an unbroken thread from monarchists, to Confederates, to NAZIs, to Trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

They don’t want to be condescended to, either, and that’s fair. Nobody likes that.

An epiphany the party may one day have regarding progressives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Here's the gist of what needs to be said

Trump is not only bad for the country, he's bad for the Republican party and Conservatism as well. Trump has kicked out nearly every sane Republican and continues to attack anyone who even barely stands up to him.

Worse, Trumps attacks and mood is random. He's an angry demented old man who backstabs any movement the moment it seems politically advantageous to do so. Be it Right or Left, Trumps overwhelming plan is this chaos.

We cannot even vote for a Speaker, write up a Platform or attract good candidates like Jon Huntsman anymore. We are 10+ years unable to pick a Speaker of the House or support them. Is this really the party of the future?

The sooner Trump is defeated, the sooner we can rebuild the party and start doing good for America again.

We cannot remain the party of Fiscal Responsibility through massive Tax Cuts anymore. We need a real plan, a real political identity and not one that immediately contradicts itself outside of Trumps cult of personality.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am no fan of conservatism but it's nice to see a level headed conservative in the wild. Since we're stuck with this two party bullshit I would love to see a functional Republican party who can compromise with Democrats and move the Overton window left.

Actually my real dream is for the party to implode, and the Democrats become the conservative party and then there's an actual left party as the other. I'm sure you'd like the conservative Democrats. They're like the Republicans were 40 years ago.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I always wonder - these "level headed conservatives" - voted for Trump anyhow right? Were they frantically writing letters to their representatives asking them to stop turning their party into a racist authoritarian laughingstock these past few years?

Nah. I'll die of old age before I could be convinced to trust a Republican, and I will never again miss any election, from local on up, to ensure that I vote for anyone, anyone at all, who isn't a Republican.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Trump may be the worst, but he is not the only bad egg in the GOP. If the GOP was a car, it would have been deemed totaled years ago. Time to start over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Elon and Zuckerfuck already working overtime to block any mentions of Republicans for Harris.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They already made "White Guys for Harris" tho.... Badump bump pish!

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 month ago

I get that this is a joke, but part of the point of that group is that we (white guys) are not exclusively Republicans and/or Trump supporters, we just don't know how to speak up in a diverse group without fulfilling the expectation of condescension. So we keep quiet and let women, people of color, and lgbtq folks do the talking while we act as allies, votes, and window dressing. White Guys for Harris is attempting to dismantle this order and say, we're not all shitheads and we do fully support an inclusive future.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

As a white guy, Harris is the first candidate I've been excited to vote for in my adult life.

I think it's important to show that not every white guy is a misogynistic racist. Especially in today's political environment.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ffs!

I'm 41 and if I live to a hundred, the DNC will still think every election takes place in 1992 where there was tens of millions of votes in convincing moderate Republicans 🤦

"Almost but not quite in a fascist cult" is not a big or realistically persuadable demographic! 🤦

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There are people who are blissfully ignorant about politics without being the rabid cults that you see in the media. Maybe this can reach some of them?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Those people probably aren't registered to a political party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quichequeen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Is this similar to the Lincoln Project? They were really active in 2020 to get Republicans to vote for Biden, and they had some anti-Trump ads playing around this year’s RNC.

Edit: typo

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I believe that was a more grassroots effort led by Republicans

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Please no, don't pander to the right. Pick up the people farther to the left and invigorate younger voters. We've had enough centrists and doing this unravels where your momentum is actually coming from. But I guess you have to appease the doners....

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The strategy that will pick up those stray Republican votes isn't going to moving to the right, it's going to be focusing on the things that shouldn't be partisan at all. Despite cosplaying as patriotic Americans, the MAGA crowd routinely positions itself in direct opposition to the core values and principles that America is supposed to stand for: liberty, equality, democracy, truth, justice, and the rule of law.

She doesn't have to run to the right, she just has to run as someone that's normal and point out how far from normal Trump and pals really are.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump did unite the country after all.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and exposed all the corruption....that he brought.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How ironic would it be if these last eight years leads to massive governmental reform and a renewed interest in checks and balances. He would have drained the swamp like he claimed but by being such a ridiculously terrible president and exposing for all to see just how corrupt and morally bereft the modern repugnicunt party is.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If it's like Kyle Rittenhouse, Im gonna bet MAGA bullies the hell out of them and really enjoy the popcorn over their stupid infighting.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kyle already flip-flopped back to ProTrump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›