this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
72 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43336 readers
778 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So like really trying to force water around it the water would have no where to go what would happen?

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 103 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I desperately want to know what you were imagining might happen when you asked this question.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 51 points 1 month ago (4 children)

A hovering blobb of liquid, equidistant from each wall, most likely.

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's basically what you get, but the distance from each wall is about an atom thick.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Hey, that atom thick distance allows the water to not stick to the coating.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not a blobb, an orb

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Like magnets

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

Or maybe explosive splashing.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

The long awaited invention of anti-gravity.

[–] turnerpike20@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

The bucket would be dry.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 90 points 1 month ago

Basically, the water would be held inside the bucket in the shape of the bucket without getting the bucket wet, because the hydrophobic coating would prevent the water from touching the bucket, however the water would still touch the hydrophobic coating, it just will not stick to the hydrophobic coating.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well the bucket would get very scared.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

hydrophobia is no laughing matter. πŸ˜‚

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

well then, why are you laughing?!

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 month ago

You ever use a paper cup? That's basically what they are.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

A black hole would open up, don't do it

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I thought that only happened if you put a hydrophobic bucket inside a hydrophobic portable hole.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not until you know the Seventh Symbol

[–] finley@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eight chevron lockedβ€” we’re going to Pegasus!

[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

β€œAlright everyone, remember where we parked!”

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

A black hole having the mass of the sund would have a Schwarzschild radius of circa 3 kilometers.

[–] ERPAdvocate@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

Eh nothing interesting. The water would be in the bucket but pool and bead much quicker, instead of spreading and getting the bucket 'wet'. Kind of like a hydrophobic windshield coating.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The water sits in it, but only where gravity holds it. There would be a very pronounced meniscus at the top. That is, if you looked closely the water would dip down really far at the edges before it meets the bucket.

It's not that hydrophobic substances can't touch water, it's that the force of surface tension will oppose it. Unless you're an ant, surface tension isn't that impressive vs. most other forces.

Edit: If you have an ant-sized bucket, the water may sit on top of it as a droplet rather than going in.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like, on the inside of the bucket? It'll still hold water like normal.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

However if you put it on the outside of the bucket nothing changes at all and this comment is a pointless thief of your time and attention. Sorry.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago

Do... you think a coating repels water a foot away like some sort of anti-water magnet...?

[–] sgibson5150@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago

Don't listen to the jeering goons, OP. Keep asking questions. πŸ€œπŸ€›

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What would happen if you lather yourself in soap so you're really slippery and then you sit in a bath?

Actually you'd probably hurt yourself getting into the bath so maybe don't try this.

I think with a jump and just the right angle of entry you can probably slide down the sloping face ...and probably end up with two broken legs and a tap half-way up your asshole.

Maybe I've been watching too much Looney tunes

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I think some of us admit to doing this as kids.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

The water disappears

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

Basically the same thing as when you fill a non-stick pan with water. Hydrophobic coatings only repel water in a way so that it doesn't stick to the surface. That's why they use hydrophobic coatings on windshields, so the droplets of water slide easily and quickly.

Granted, the effect is more noticeable with hydrophobic coating than with non-stick coating, but if you were expecting the water to visibly float away from the walls, that won't happen with either. Reality is sometimes disappointing, huh?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure you’d get one big bead of water. Something much more interesting are superfluids.

[–] davoid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

makes me want to spray some in a urinal

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What would happen if you sprayed your body with hydrophobic spray and then went down a slip-n-slide?

[–] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Probably something like that scene in Christmas Vacation where Chevy Chase sprays nonstick on the bottom of his metal disc sled thingy

[–] mub@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It'll stay empty of course. If make a big enough bucket to stand in and you could go deep sea diving without an airtank.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Made me think of the LiquiGlide ketchup video from a few years ago.

Did this stuff ever get used anywhere or just vaporware?

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry that's simply not allowed