howrar

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Anything we can provide is just a drop in the ocean of data they already have. Plus, this was how image generation worked before we got diffusion models (see "generative adversarial networks") and they never reached the level of image quality that diffusion models did.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It takes one day to do the actual voting. It takes a lot more time to figure out who to vote for.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 9 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Better question: Where do you put the dx?

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

What do you mean? Your ear and nose are connected in a way, but I've never heard of ears having an influence on smell.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People often distinguish between taste and flavour. Taste would be what you sense on your tongue. Flavour, would be what you sense in your nose.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why would we need anyone to buy things? Remember that money is an abstraction for resources. If you can do everything with AI, then you already have all the resources you need. Whether or not someone else needs what you produce is irrelevant when you already have access to everything you could want.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

It's not completely subjective. Think about it from an information theory perspective. We want a word that maximizes the amount of information conveyed, and there are many situations where you need a word that distinguishes AGI, LLMs, deep learning, reinforcement learning, pathfinding, decision trees and the like from the outputs of other computer science subfields. "AI" has historically been that word, so redefining it without a replacement means we don't have a word for this thing we want to talk about anymore.

I refuse to replace a single commonly used word in my vocabulary with a full sentence. If anyone wants to see this changed, then offer an alternative.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I get the impression that many drug dealers would be happy to take gift cards as payment.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah, makes sense. Thanks

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm not disagreeing. I'm confused because I don't see how it's relevant to the comment you responded to.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I'm so confused by this comment. Are you trying to say that putting a live animal under extreme pressure and zapping them would constitute animal cruelty?

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago

I'm trying to help OP reach an answer to their question, therefore the definitions I'm working with are the same as that of OP. What I personally believe should be categorized as a "higher being" is irrelevant because if it's different from OP's definition, it won't help them reach their desired answer.

 

I was looking up when babies can safely start eating untoasted bread and one of the images led me to this website that sells... stuff? Are they selling me the question? Who knows.

Then if you scroll down to the related products, you can buy a basketball club for $30, down from $15!

I'm guessing this is some phishing website looking to steal credit cards. I also still haven't found an answer to my original question.

view more: next ›