this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

News

22839 readers
3655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Why aren't these guys in jail? Seriously. I mean, I know the theory of the rule of law and all, but even our widely-acclaimed greatest president suspended habeas corpus when insurgent seditionists tried to overthrow the Union.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I suspect that this is extremely dry humor, but for others that read this, Trump pardoned both Bannon and Stone

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it's still unfathomable that trump was "allowed" (I know it was "legal", don't point that out) to pardon his literal partners-in-crime. He basically has already self-pardoned himself by proxy by allowing these traitors to walk free.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ford pardoned Nixon.

Bush Jr pardoned Scooter Libby.

Governor Abbott pardoned a pedophile for shooting a black girl's white boyfriend

Why is this even remotely surprising?

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if I'm joking. In any case, the writ of habeas corpus is the legal tool that a court can theoretically use to compel the appearance of a prisoner before it. It is the legal doctrine that underlies the right to trial, and I say "theoretically" because courts rarely need to issue one; it's just standard procedure to bring people to court to face charges.

By suspending it, Abraham Lincoln could detain those people he deemed dangerous seditionists indefinitely, because the detainees would have to go to court to challenge their detention, and there was no way to get to court. The effect of suspending it again is that it wouldn't matter that Baboon (autocorrect and I'm leaving it) and Stone were pardoned, or that there were even criminal charges.

Lincoln did it, George W. Bush did it. Barack Obama did it. The Constitution contains a clause which allows it to be suspended due to rebellion or threats to public safety. It's a dangerous thing to allow a president to do, but the MAGA danger might be greater.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Worth noting that, historically speaking, if a state official wanted to punish someone without going through the court system he could always just turn the prisoner over to a lynch mob.

So while suspending habeaus corpus is a danger to democracy, it is not a singular method by which mayors, governors, or Presidents have disposed of political opponents.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Throughout human history, laws have never stopped conservatism. Jails have never stopped conservatism. Pacifism has never stopped conservatism. Only force has ever stopped conservatism. Only force.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Careful or you'll get called a tankie

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People get called that when they're pretending to be far left while urging everyone to take the exact actions the Repubs want them to take.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Is this code for "people who aren't voting for Joe Biden"?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

that would be people who are essentially voting for trump, so yeah, why not.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's code for "antifascist" "leftists" who are urging people to do the exact same things that the Republican party wants them to do.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

urging people to do the exact same things

Specifically, which things?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're upset about being called a tankie, you could cross-reference what you are urging people to do with what the Republican party wants people to do. And then stop that.

In general I would recommend being antifascist in a way that isn't the exact same actions as overt fascism with the only difference being the rhetoric justifying the actions.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

What am I urging people to do?

[–] Censored@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tankie is the pro-authoritarian left. The Stalinists essentially. The ones who think it's appropriate to send in the tanks to quell a socialist or communist uprising because it has a tint of democracy in it, which may cause their strong leader to lose dictatorial power.

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tankies are literal authoritarians. People say they're "authoritarian communists," which ignores they're mostly Maoists or Stalinists, both of whom were closer to fascism than the left. It sort of ignores the basic premise of communism or even socialism to have a single authoritarian ruler. Kind of like how the Nazis called themselves socialists. I guess they were a workers' party to start, but I don't think you can reasonably conflate their ideology with the tenets of socialism.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, you don't understand. The problem is that those people haven't had enough time to bring upon real communism. Real communism hasn't been reached yet. They want to let the Maos and Stalins of the world have enough time to reach communism. Things will surely be different with the next guy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

That's certainly a take

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if they're actually dumb enough to try the false electors scheme twice in a row?

They got caught are being convicted right now for doing it in 2020, and everybody is expecting it now.

[–] m13@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Whatever the result they’re going to keep trying again. Why wouldn’t they when there are virtually no consequences? Fascists don’t give a damn about what election results say, they’re always going to try to gain power by any means necessary.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The trials are being sandbagged by republican judges, nobody is actually getting punished for trying to steal the election. They're gonna do it again.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Uh... If you don't want your election stolen, you, uh, you gotta vote. Vote so hard they can't steal it. Make your friends vote. Make your friends' friends vote.

Because if we don't win this year, we don't get to have any more elections. No more voting. We're getting rid of it because your don't vote good.

[–] joostjakob@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they'll do increasingly farcical votes for some time after.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

That's basically Texas and Florida right now

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

How would he know? Trump isn't supposed to talk with felons.

[–] D1G17AL@kbin.run 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if anyone else has pointed this out, in this photo especially, Roger Stone looks like a caricature of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Roger Stone looks like a caricature of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.

Who is himself a caricature of an old and evil rich man. If the shoe fits..

Btw, remember when he showed up to the inauguration looking like a literal Batman villain?

IIRC, Mr. Burns was meant to be a caricature of specifically Rupert Murdoch.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I say if Ebeneezer Scrooge were a real person and alive today, that is exactly what he would look like.

[–] havocpants@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

wow, posh spice let herself go

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The jailcells gonna be crowded with all the reservations these criminals are laying out

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's been 4 years. How's that working out so far?

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Republicans get away with so much despicable action and each time the Dems get pants by the audacity of the attempt. That's how we are here now.

The conservatives will try absolutely anything, up to and including armed insurrection. Now with AR15s, and probably with bumpstocks fitted.

Don't think that it could never happen. The MAGA element love being underestimated.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Democrats like to bitch about Republicans but their platforms are 95% the same. The real enemy is leftists, and they'll take Trump for 4 terms before they ever give an inch to the left.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

their platforms are 95% the same.

Economically, yes, but socially, no. That social part matters quite a bit.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ehhhhh it matters less than dems want us to think. Social policy doesn't matter if nobody can make endsmeat. The social policy of dems is just the other wing of our singular corporate party providing the illusion of choice.

Christofascism or fascism with a pride flag, either way we funnel more of our wealth to the 1% and further disenfranchise everybody else.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

fascism with a pride flag

Wait, what? I've never heard anyone claim that those are in in way similar before. That's a new one for me.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My point is that democrat voters are rewarding D politicians for pushing and enacting the very fascist legislation they claim to be protecting us from - because apparently fascism is fine so long as they pay lip service to the lgbtqia community.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

I'm a Republican that does their own Research and even though the election hasn't happened yet I ALREADY KNOW TRUMP LOST UNFAIRLY because of Sleepy Joe Biden being UNFAIR!