this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
514 points (91.6% liked)

politics

23281 readers
3453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Elissa Slotkin can fuck off.

Detailing her plan, Slotkin – a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency…

Oh, she can really fuck off.

Edit:

“I can’t do what she does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist,” she concluded.

This is code for not rocking the boat.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So abandon economic justice and civil rights.

Is there anything left?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago

The color blue, instead of red.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The democrats were never left.

Let's get back to our controlled opposition roots.

Thats the ratcheting effect

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I would encourage everyone to watch the video of her speech. The title of this post is incredibly misleading. And takes points out of context.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago
[–] GrassCat@lemmy.world 246 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

Elissa Slotkin IS the oligarchy. She is the Hot Dog Princess. Her grandpa owned BallPark Franks—subsidiary of the Tyson Foods megacorp. Every time someone eats a hot dog, Elissa gets more passive income than most folks earn from a year’s labor.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She sucks, I voted for Harper in the primaries but the Dems are full of neo-libs like her. It's hard to see that party go more liberal even with Sander's and AOC's help

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

They actively work against Sanders and AOC. Both are the enemy to the average corporate-whore Dem.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 184 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"Not resonating with voters"

Bernie and AOC's "Fighting Oligarchy" campaign is pulling in more people to their rallies than attended Obama's in 08.

Don't peddle that horseshit you Liberal traitor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 159 points 1 week ago (16 children)

We don't need more "pro-israel centrists"

The reason Dem turnout in generals is depressed, is our choices are CIA war criminals like Slotking or a republican.

She is the problem, not the 99.9% who don't want an oligarchy

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Trebuchet@lemm.ee 107 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 99 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

No, she can fuck off.

The oligarchy is killing us, and spinning language won’t change that. Meanwhile, ‘woke’ just means ‘social empathy’, which is ironically the solution to many of the problems the oligarchy is causing (and they’re not shy about this – Musk recently said empathy is bad).

We need more ‘woke’, not less. And being butthurt that the fascists are using ‘woke’ as a slur against us is childish and easy to ignore if you’re not too simple to get it.

Fuck this. I’m woke and proud of it. We all should be.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Maybe the democrats need to ditch pro-oligarchy anti-woke members 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] mcv@lemm.ee 71 points 1 week ago

Way to advertise what side she's really on.

[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 68 points 1 week ago

The oligarchy pays me to pretend to fight for you! Wait. Cut that part.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

So many people will say "this is a gross oversimplification, they do lots of progressive things" while ignoring the world around them.

The fact we had to invent a political term for them is enough to tell me that we need to abandon this fascist supporting party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Her name is: Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI)

Just so you don't accidentally vote for her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago

I can’t do what [AOC] does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist

"It's pragmatic for me to avoid making my Republican donors upset." What an idiot.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 week ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 week ago

Willfully or blindly ignorant, but the result is the same.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 55 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Man I figured this was paraphrased because I can't trust a headline nowadays even if it used quotes but nope. Used those exact terms in that way. Says to retake flag energy. Fuck that nationalist shit. Definately need to redefine patriotism around the constitution and civil rights but sure as shit not around the flag. The flag is a symbol of the ideals that should be respected not a thing itself to respect.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 50 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And this is why fascism is winning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

She’s sorta right. ‘Oligarchy’ is a big college word that Joe Bumblefuck doesn’t understand.

Aristocrats is a good word, but again: “duh?”

Therefore Dems just need to start harping about “rich fucking parasites”

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago

Yep, this is a branding issue.

Oligarchy => "rich fucking parasites"

Woke = equality (equity too, but stick with equality for sake of simplicity)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

And this is why we need more decent folk around the country like AOC to run for any and all offices.

The unfalsifiable orthodoxy. Moving to the far-right and appealing to moderate Republicans win elections. If a Democrat wins, it proves that this works, if a Democrat loses, they just hadn't moved far-right enough.

load more comments
view more: next ›