Edited, thanks!
Huh, I didn’t know that. It looks like you’re right:
A federal law, the Hyde Amendment [1977], is already in place to block federal funding from going to abortion services and PPWP is audited annually to verify our compliance.
So this is even more performative and vindictive than it seemed at first glance. Thanks for pointing that out!
In addition, Planned Parenthood isn’t just an abortion clinic. It’s much more, providing crucial anonymous and free healthcare to the communities it serves.
Here’s a debunking article from 2017, after Republicans were lying about it:
Planned Parenthood served 2.4 million people last year and provided 328,348 abortions, according to its annual report. That works out to 13.7 percent of patients.
eta: that leaves nearly 90% of their patients seeking non-abortive care. I don’t know if it’s the same today, but in my day, they were the major non-school, community sex-Ed advocacy group.
The remainder received services including cancer screenings, sexually transmitted infection testing and contraception. Nationally, STI testing and contraception were a part of more than 7 million visits. […] Nationally, Planned Parenthood provided 9,419 “prenatal services" and 2,889 adoption referrals in 2016.
In many places, they’re amongst the only free, anonymous providers of reproductive healthcare that young people can turn to for preventative education and care, pregnancy wellness, family planning, and yes, abortion.
It’s disheartening they’re under attack again. In 2024.
e: inclusivity: they provide men’s reproductive services, too! Thanks @Nougat & @FuglyDuck!
True. I just think that’s a distinction without a difference.
In a perfect world, where the president was chosen by the popular vote, yes, you’d be right. Going by pure mathematics, everything you said is true.
Unfortunately we have the electoral college, and in key places, the margins are so thin that only a handful of voters being swayed to vote for Stein can make all the difference. We saw this in 2016, where the popular vote went to Hillary but she lost, and the margins in key areas was less than what Stein won in those areas.
This is why she’s being pushed so hard. It has worked before.
I get that people are disillusioned by the clusterfuck that FPTP voting has created, which is why I’ve been pushing so hard for people to fight that, rather than protest-voting, which is objectively worse.
Who’s annoyed, lol? Do you think I haven’t noticed you downvote my every comment within seconds, but I haven’t downvoted you once? Are you aware some instances let you see who downvotes what? XD
I’m not mad, lol. Just mildly amused at your dedication to the bit.
Again, FairVote Action. I’ll keep linking it until you actually look at it.
You’re hilarious. You know I meant what the second-top comment on this post said:
In the sixty days since this account was created, it has made four thousand seven hundred and ninety-one submissions to Lemmy.
That averages out to one every eighteen minutes and two seconds twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.
Everyone can see it. You’re very transparent. Keep replying, though. You only look weirder with each reply.
So why did you come back here, where people are rational?
Again, if you truly believe that 3rd parties need a place at the table (and for the record, I truly believe they do), you should be pushing people to support FairVote Action, not Jill Stein.
Considering your nearly inhuman posting frequency, you could be an effective agent for actual change. So why are you wasting your time doing this instead of using your considerable free time to actually make a difference?
Men, definitely.. They do cancer screening, and men tend to be squeamish about prostrate exams (& I don’t blame them; I feel someone should pay me for my mammograms, not the other way round)), and ‘free’ & ‘anonymous’ removes a couple of hurdles.
e: ‘definitely’, not ‘too’. Weed kicked in as I started this comment. Sorry.