this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

196

16215 readers
2214 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Another bash.org memory (paraphrasing)...

User: I just downloaded a song on Napster and when it finished, I noticed the guy I downloaded it from was now downloading it from me

User: I sent him a message saying I just got that song from him

User: He said, "I know, I'm getting my song back asshole"

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] rosa666parks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Stop perpetuating the gold standard myth. There's as much point having a gold standard as there is any other stable finite chemical.

The problem was neoliberalism/conservatism, which systematically removed all the labor and wealth redistribution policies of the post WW2 era, at the same time as boomers AND women were entering the workforce — higher supply of workers = lower demand and wages — the EU and Japan were rebuilt and competitive, offshoring and automation was gearing up (wage suppression + higher profits for capitalism), the deregulation of financial markets and regulatory/financial capture of government that enabled extreme financial predation, etc, etc.

The gold standard change would be irrelevant if we didn't live in oligarchies masquerading as democracies — where your level of wealth is directly proportional to your level of freedom, speech, and political representation.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

While topically interesting, a lot of those graphs are either saying the same thing or are misinterpreting an exponential.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yup this is left wing pseudo science instead of right wing pseudo science. These are just some graphs that don't prove anything without a scientific paper to back it up.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

"pseudo science"

It's a website with "wtf" in its name, chill. It just shows the degradation of purchase power firstly as a consequence of the 70s oil crisis, and then as a consequence of increased neoliberalism.

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Well what you’re calling left wing psudoscience is an article by Economic Policy Institute: https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/

They explain their methodology and data sources in meticilous detail, even more so in their report on how they do; https://www.epi.org/publication/understanding-the-historic-divergence-between-productivity-and-a-typical-workers-pay-why-it-matters-and-why-its-real/

If that’s not enough here’s some more stuff:

https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/135/2/645/572126

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08185.pdf