spujb

joined 6 months ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 27 points 19 hours ago

I also love that they say it’s “not very funny,” conceding it’s a little funny but still worth mod action anyway

 

this wasn’t one but also making a ManBearPig reference in current year should be a felony

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

ew ecofascism joke gross gross

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

excellent posts today guys keep it up

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

i’m saying like 😭 😭

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 25 points 2 days ago

the term in association with software predates windows by 6 years (1979-1985) and only 2 years for MS-DOS (1981)

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 73 points 2 days ago (3 children)

rtfm and other toxicity in the gnu/linux community are a microsoft psyop change my mind

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 7 points 2 days ago

are you straight gay or wavy gay?

362
gaea rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yep, posted to !modlog@lemmy.world and it immediately made a downturn 🥲

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago

oops i misunderstood which instance you were criticizing in my other comment my apologies

your comment is a little confusing and i have no opinion on it, take care :)

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago

ahh thank u for trying <3

101
rule (lemmy.cafe)
 
 

STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT STOP USING QUEER CULTURE FOR POLITICAL CLOUT context

230
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Important context: This was an instance of a crowd crush caused by poor crowd control.

edit: action has now been taken against the offending comment :)

(also some of you guys in the comments here have been yoinked by mods too… just be nice? this post was not an invitation to test out your boundaries)

by opening this spoiler you acknowledge that brigading and harrassment are against the ruleslink to post in question: https://lemmy.world/comment/10965360

 

This is inspired by this advice from a few months ago:

Stop giving shitty mods a free pass. Honest mistakes happen; but if the mod in question is assumptive, disingenuous, trigger-happy, or eager to enable certain shitty types of user, spread the word about their comm being poorly moderated. And don’t interact directly with the comm. I think that at least here in the Fediverse we should demand higher standards from our mods.

(Emphasis mine.)

In the past I have used places like !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world or !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone to call out mods on other subs, with mid-to-almost-high degrees of success, but I wonder if it would be better to have a dedicated sublemmy?

Here are my thoughts on what would make this effective:

  • probably shouldn’t be hosted on .world due to the breadth of possible conflicts of interest with admins
  • probably shouldn’t be hosted on .ml due to federation hurdles
  • mods of the community shouldn’t moderate any other communities of any significant size, in order to make the whole “accountability” thing work
  • mods should be willing and able to deal with substantial quantities of garbage posts because there would be a lot of “why won’t c/xyz let me be transphobic/say slurs 😡😡” type submissions which, left unaddressed, would outflood genuine criticism

This is still in conceptual form so I am interested what others think :)

 
 
202
small penis rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 
240
sir rule sir 🙂 (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
view more: next ›