this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
385 points (94.5% liked)

Science Memes

10271 readers
2776 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Argurotoxus@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Engineer: 2, but 3 to be safe.

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The budget is for 1.5, make it work.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Oh, hi Boeing Manager.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wouldn't they just look up the answer in a table?

[–] Argurotoxus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Nah not anymore, now you spend a day or so building some convoluted excel calculator once so that you never need to do the calcs again.

Then, 3 years later when you go to add or change something in that calculator, you have absolutely no idea how it works and decide the change wasn't that important anyway.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

1+1=3 in cases of large 1's

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

ok, I define 1 as {∅} and 2 as {∅, {∅}}

proving the addition holds is slightly more complicated

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love the comment that it's "occasionally useful"

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm yes.. set theory... I don't understand anything happening here

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There is actually a really good explanation for us math-curious non-mathematicians here:
https://blog.plover.com/math/PM.html

[–] MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That's some good read, thank you so much.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

+ is a map from N×N to N where a + 0 = a and a + S(b) = S(a + b) (S is the successor function that gives the next number).
Then 1 + 1 = 1 + S(0) = S(1 + 0) = S(1) = 2.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

seems a little sus to use + to define +

[–] apolo399@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

No, it's correct. You define the operation by it's properties. It's not saying that "a plus 0 = a" but "the result of applying the binary operation '+' to any number with 0 should give the original number."

  • is just a symbol. You could instead write it as +(a,0)=a and +(a,S(b))=S(+(a,b)).

You have to have previously defined 1=S(0), 2=S(1), 3=S(2), and so on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] porl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I really recommend the YouTube channel "Another Roof". His first few videos were building up exactly this idea, as well as building up all the real numbers (possibly complex too if I'm remembering correctly). Sounds like a dry topic but he uses humour really well throughout. https://youtube.com/@anotherroof

Here is a playlist of the topic: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsdeQ7TnWVm_EQG1rmb34ZBYe5ohrkL3t

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

ooh, that looks interesting!

[–] callyral@pawb.social 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

1 + 1 is not equal to a question mark.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What did 1 minus 1 equal before zero was invented? 🤔

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, define "zero".

The one invented on India at around the Middle Age is a different one. The one you are asking about is very old.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You forgot accountant

"What do you need it to be?"

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

We need to report negative earnings so we don't have to pay taxes obviously

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] hexabs@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm surprised the 6 year old knows factorials.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Not only that, it is mathematically correct, at least given the usual definitions of 1, 2, +, and !

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can't put an expression on the left-hand-side of the assignment operator.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You need more expressive languages.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Error, float detected when int expected

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Computer Scientist: 0 and a carry bit

Mathematician: S(1)

[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 7 points 1 month ago

Quantum physicist: Whats the uncertainty?!

[–] Aarrodri@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Terrence Howard : 2 !! Also 1x1=2 !!

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Math isn't induction. Its deductive logic.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How would a two year old know factorials?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Appliance salesperson: oven + pan = hamburger

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I appreciate the latex-style quotes around the mathematician's 1

load more comments
view more: next ›