this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
275 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A frustrated Trump has posted more than 10 times since Biden's announcement.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 124 points 1 month ago (3 children)

he is asking for a reimbursement for the money spent on fighting Biden. lol, i don't think that's how campaign funding works

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Half of the American folks who can be arsed to vote want him to rule the country forever.
That's how it works.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That still doesn’t explain who is supposed to reimburse him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

This is the dingus that brought us "Mexico will pay for the wall", after all.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

We'll think about it as soon as you reimburse all the donors who have been paying your legal bills.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 121 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Trump unveiled the realities of the wasted money and resources the Trump team now has to deal with. "Now we have to start all over again. Shouldn't the Republican Party be reimbursed for fraud in that everybody around Joe"

Can we all please take a moment to seriously reflect on this?

Irrespective of party, campaigning should not primarily be about attacking your rival. It should be about what you intend to do and what you have done to benefit your constituents. Your policies and successful legislation should be what you spend your money on promoting. It should be about the vision you have for this country outside the context of who comes before or after you in office.

This is, in part, why so many people are resentful of elections - they're 100% full of negativity. Give us some hope. Give us some tangible examples of what's been accomplished. Keep the name of your opposition out of your speeches. Reflect on existing policy you want to change, why you feel it needs to change, and how you intend on changing it. Give us some vision of the future for us to unite around and get excited for.

[–] geekworking@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

You have mistakenly assumed that the GOP wants or cares about democracy.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Ok, you and me. We're going to start our own country. One where political competition doesn't hate and belittle the other. One where the loser of the election graciously bows out knowing their country will be stronger for it.

I'm running my campaign on the development of medical research, and the fighting of AI influence.

Also bacon. Just.....just bacon.

[–] xionzui@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is it’s effective. Unless you design a system where the most effective strategy for winning a position isn’t making people afraid of the alternative, it’s just going to come back

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It didn't used to be this way... I still remember when John McCain shut down a woman spouting lies about Obama, and defended him as a good man. This obstructionism and negativity originated in Congress. It's easy to point fingers at presidential negativity, because Trump is leading the charge now, but it was Newt Gingrich, Mitch McConnell and Co that opened the door for him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Newt, Rush, and Roger Ailes damaged this country so much.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I really hope someone revokes that shitty medal Limbaugh got. I dont care if hes dead.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Also bacon. Just.....just bacon.

Can we have dogs too, as long as I promise they won't eat all the bacon?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

........you mean as pets, right? Not as lunch....right? RIGHT???

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 month ago

FUCK YOU! YOU AND YOUR CUR CAN ROT IN HELL.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

just bacon

You sir/madam have just earned my vote. Where do I register?

I'm in. But it boils down to 1-person-1-vote and every adult citizen is automatically registered.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And maybe this will be adopted as a new strategy to combat these long drawn out campaigns and negative ads. Change the presumptive candidate at the last moment possible.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I didn't want Joe to drop out. But I always saw this as the one big benefit to such a late change - until the GOP/Russian trolls get their talking points straight, regular people once again own social media discussions. And we are absolutely making use of it.

[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Why I hate both parties. They've turned this into a chit show.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Your such a LIBTARD! Why would I care about POLICIES that could HELP ME live a better and more fulfilling life with the ability to leave my kids a chonky inheritance when I die when TRANS PEOPLE STILL EXIST?

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago

Trump: "LOL you're too old for the job!"

Biden: "OK, I leave."

Trump: "No wait! How am I supposed to win now?"

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The GOP claimed it had prepped poll-tested attacks ads on Harris, and had an extensive oppo research file on her. They claimed it was all teed up and ready to go.

A complete lie. They're winging it.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 27 points 1 month ago

All the money went to legal bills.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Are you saying talking about how she laughs is not serious oppo research?

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I hope he survives his aneurysm to enjoy his time in a supermax after a black woman grabs him by the pussy.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

When you're a convicted felon you squat and cough first.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wouldn't she grab him by the bussy?

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Ew. Imaging the stench.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Is he mad that the race has now been reframed as Former Prosecutor and Current Vice President Kamala Harris vs 34 Time Convicted Felon Donald Trump? Aww. Poor baby. I hope his fucking muppet grin from the debate has been fully wiped off now.

He sure is fragile for a strong man. But I guess that's how it goes. Doth protest too much and all that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good. I bet he's also so GRR MAD that it is not himself at the center of attention - other than people saying how old he is and calling him Dementia Donnie, and saying he should probably bow out because he's obviously been pooping into diapers for a decade or so, etc...

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Damp Diaper Donnie

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Hahahahaha. You love to see it.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Dementia Donald having trouble? Who would have guessed.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

GOOD GODS ABOVE AND BELOW I FUCKING LOVE WATCHING THESE CHUD FASCIST SIMP SCUM SQUIRM 💜

it is
H E A L I N G
me