this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Open Source

30306 readers
635 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First, they restricted code search without logging in so I'm using sourcegraph But now, I cant even view discussions or wiki without logging in.

It was a nice run

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venji10@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You don’t need the question mark. If something is for-profit (or can be used for profit) then sooner or later it will be enshittified.

They have teams of people whose entire job is figuring out ways to wring a few more cents from somebody. Put them at the helm of a company that’s stood for 1000 years and they’ll be thrilled at how easy it will be to use that name to sell plastic dogshit at a premium price.

No. I am able to decide for myself, whether or not I need 2FA. A code via E-Mail is enough for me. If you feel like you need 2FA; feel free to enable it for yourself...

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A code via E-Mail is enough for me.

Which basically is another type of 2FA...

[–] venji10@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

At least this one isn't utter bullshit

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Not sure how a company can turn a public digital key or a mathematically calculated number (both of them completely unlinked to your real identity in any way) to profit. But you do you I guess.

[–] venji10@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Well, I never said that. It just generally shows the direction, they are heading. They are literally FORCING you to enable that. I am not a baby. I don't need a babysitter.