this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
936 points (98.0% liked)
Fuck AI
2635 readers
1422 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ok, but it's not. Did you have some additional arguments or discussion points or is it just hate with you
No hate over here. I don't even disagree with you. I just found it funny that you're so vehemently arguing that vibe coding won't rot your brain, but you tried to express it with a nonsensical "if then" statement.
Edit: To clarify, I do think there's a concerted effort to devalue software engineers. CEOs are pretending that junior engineers can be replaced by LLMs and that senior engineers can get more done in less time with LLMs. I'm deeply skeptical of these claims, and I think they're lying through their teeth in order to drive their stock prices up in the short term, and software engineer salaries down in the medium/long term. So, I don't think LLMs are as competent as they claim. I also don't think they'll rot your brain if you choose to "vibe code".
I don't agree. I have never said anything like that. I think it is a poor learning tool. None of my comment is indicative of being even close to what strawman argument you are hating on
This implies to me that you disagree with the post, which says corporations are deliberately deskilling people with LLMs.
I agree, and am skeptical that LLMs will make people lose their skills.
So, I don't think corporations are de-skilling people.
My point of clarification is that I think they are de-valuing their labor.
What's the strawman argument?
I do not hate you! Why do you keep repeating that?