this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
259 points (95.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

3219 readers
205 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fancy cupcakes are 70% icing, really not that nice and a waste of money

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Three decades ago or so I read 13 novels in the Star Wars Story. Got tired of Sci-fi and went Fantasy because in that last one Luke got laid and didn't lose his Jedi powers like he was supposed to.

Whatever. I put that last book as not real to the story and like the dozen that came before I read to be what I respected. Still didn't give a flying fuck to read any more Star Wars.

Then GL comes back from the grave and summons it all again, finally. After a few movies popped up the super duped fan club psyched up and asked him what his fucking stand held on all these SW novels written were regarding the matter and if they had any cannon.

He muttered and I couldn't here him so obviously the're fucking cannon and literally everything he's vampirised the entire notion from and to just didn't fucking happen. If you were a sucker to his reverse mechnics on a trash truck and tried to say fucking anything to me, then I facepalmed crying out laughing because I called it again but gorram not even that candidly such. He Cash Cows over all the ressurected fan club to the biggest business butcher brand co. on the planet like dissing the joint on your leg for respecting them, ever. Suckers.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you having an aneurysm? Or are you a malfunctioning LLM responding randomly to posts or something? This is the second time you've replied to me and in both cases what you responded with was a) incoherent, and b) not actually relevant to what you're responding to.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't even notice you were the same. In the second case, it had nothing to do with you. It was just an opportunity to tell the story. In the first case, I'm not even going to touch that again when you don't have a question. Nope.