this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
73 points (86.9% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Harris will still suck, but she'll do a much better job at fighting fascists than Joe did

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The polling so far gives me doubt.

I want someone who isn't Trump to win this fucking election, I don't personally care who it is as long as they can deliver. My concern is that Harris can't and, if so, she should step back as well.

This isn't a time for "Well I gave it my all". Have a plan to win or GTFO.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My concern is that Harris can’t

I think she'll get a huge bump when/if she's the named candidate.

Progressives are pretty experienced at holding our noses, especially if there's plausible deniability about the candidate.

I'm a lot more confident in her chances than Joe's, and I think she's the only other option the DNC will give us.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The youth don't traditionally vote for "Not Trump" - we need to actually excite the voters.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What happened in 2020?

Harris will be enough, just like Joe was last time.

Because it's easier to ignore potential disappointment than ignore an ongoing disappointment

[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Well what they said was that she had too much baggage from Bill. And wasn't likeable. And wasn't Bernie. And didn't look like a President. I dunno, I voted for her and so did everyone I know. Seemed like entrenched misogyny to me.

But Roe was the law of the land back then. Might make a difference.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Bill?

He was young, charismatic, and pretended to be very progressive when campaigning...

Worked.out great. Then we doubled down with Obama after that.

Then for some reason after that we've just been running elderly unpopular candidates that are more conservative than Dem voters...

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Agreed with this 100%

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, this. Let's whip up some real competition and select someone that we can really get normies to rally behind.

[–] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m ambivalent to slightly negative on Harris (mostly because I still don’t know what her health care plan is) but at least she can express her thoughts coherently. If nothing else I feel confident in her ability to articulate the case against a felon given her background as a prosecutor.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Yeah, no one's saying she'll be great.

She just meets the incredibly low bar of looking great next to trump. Joe cant

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

she'll do a much better job at fighting fascists than Joe did

Why do you say this?

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I don’t think Kamala would have fumbled the debate. I think she would have put Trump in his place and called him out on his bullshit lies. We would be having a different discussion and who knows, maybe a loaner kid would still be alive today.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Cops dont fight fascists, they protect them