this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
648 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4547 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thomas Matthew Crooks, the suspectin Saturday’s shooting, was registered as a Republican voter, according to Pennsylvania records.

Already the republicans are dismissing his voter registration as meaningless. Here comes the “mental illness” angle.

Edit: apparently it’s not uncommon to register with the party you oppose in PA. This is going to be a fun ride.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

No one in the history of actual combat shooting is taught to take non lethal shots. Ever.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Idk what your talking about. You shoot the gun out of the hand. Then you shoot the hat off for intimidation and the somewhere nearby you shoot the rope of someone getting hanged to free them to kinda balance things out. This is all common sense.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I cannot argue with your rootin' tootin' shootin' logic.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago

You’re right, let’s go get some spaghetti!

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean with combat shooting? Because here in Finland police is trained to (and required by law) to try to minimize the damage and if possible, to stop someone without killing them, usually by shooting at the legs etc. But that's more for knife fielding attacker and other situation where such shots are more possible and not when the cops or others are being shot at

[–] teft@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean US military and police training.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Ah, then I can believe that such measures aren't taught or used

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

This isn't the military. You said no one, which is not true.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was an era where some cops were trained to shoot at limbs but even cops knew to ignore that shit.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's the normal procedure here in Finland to try to take someone down with shooting in the legs or somewhere else that they might survive from. Not the case if they start shooting of course, it's more for situation where they're wielding a knife and coming for the cop or someone else

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Right, and that's nonsense, people suck at aiming when they're scared.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Seems to work here. They have to go through a lot of training.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Just as well it's not just "people", it's the trained and armed police. Same happens in the UK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lee_Rigby

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Combat shooting? It's not a warzone. Come to Europe, mate.