politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Would also be convenient for him if the Dems stick with Biden.
The Dem chance at a clean change from Biden to a younger option was last year, not 4 months prior, at least not with how the antiquated US election system works. Changing it now is fucking stupid, the table has been set. People are calling to flip the table because somehow they're just now realizing that old people are old. This is what the Dem leadership has created, and regardless of their second guessing now it's what we need to live with.
Just another in a long running series of stupid decisions by Dem leadership over the last 30 years, always shooting themselves in the foot and assuming people will still vote for them. With middling success every time, yet never learning anything because the same old fucks are still running it all somehow.
4 months should be enough time still, IMO
Enough time for what? There's no way to put together another primary. So who in the Democratic party gets to play kingmaker?
The same party insiders who've played kingmaker during the last two primaries
Pretty fuckin scary just how literal that word is now, after the immunity ruling.
Idgaf. Let them pick a king and then I'll vote for him so we don't get Trump
Just so we're clear, what if the king is a woman?
I would definitely vote for King Margo. "Ovary up, bitch."
I would absolutely vote for King Margo.
If you're going to vote blue regardless then your opinions on primary elections and the candidates can be safely ignored.
The people you're trying to reach will not vote blue no matter who. They need to be convinced, given enthusiasm rather than apathy and derision.
I mean, exactly. The people who need reaching aren't gonna vote for old man Biden, so swapping to literally anyone gives a better chance at beating Trump, and we don't have the luxury of time. A random choice will have some chance to attract those voters Biden won't.
Agreed. Literally anyone else would increase the margin of undecideds.
If you're going to complain about the DNC playing kingmaker, I hope you're equally outraged about Hillary's campaign being given financial control of the party before the 2016 primary, or Obama convincing multiple candidates to drop out and give Biden enough room to beat Bernie in 2020, or the DNC making the South Carolina primary the first on the calendar to sure up support for Biden in 2024. If that doesn't outrage you, you might consider the possibility that you don't actually care that the Democrats pick kings, just that your preferred candidate might not be crowned.
Oh, you don't like it?
How the fuck about that.