this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
83 points (91.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden's latest attempt to convince everyone he has what it takes to stay in the race will air at 6:30 PM Eastern / 3:30 PM Pacific.

More on where and how to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/how-to-watch-biden-press-conference-a70590e7574fc9680229b6b6289f6a02

My expectation is that it will be on all the usual sources. CNN, MSNBC, etc. etc. with in depth coverage on the talking head shows later tonight.

Edit Conference is running ~~20+~~ 50+ minutes late after already being pushed back 1 hour from 5:30 to 6:30.

Not sure if that's good news or bad news.

Here we go! 58 minutes late, but he's on a roll talking about NATO.

Oh, snap! Reminding everyone that Article 5 has only been used once... 9/11.

Speech ran less than 10 minutes, but was a strong speech, now the questions.

Fumbles on the first answer, calling out "Vice President Trump". :(

Ended after almost an hour with one final question on "Vice President Trump" - Biden's answer "Listen to him." End conference.

Overall, I'm pretty happy with how it went!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think he's really doing anything to appease critics. He's not doing bad, he's just not doing well either. I'm sure the "Vice President Trump" bit will make its way around pretty quick.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As someone who is in the camp of calling for Biden to step down, if he would've just done this during the debate, we wouldn't have ever had a problem. Sure, he stumbled and mixed names up... Whatever. George W Bush did far worse, let alone Trump. But that debate performance? That looked closer to outright dementia, I'm sorry. And now in the back of everyone's minds is when is the inevitable next time he does this? For he certainly isn't getting any younger, and that sure as shit wasn't a cold. Meanwhile the apathetic battleground swing-voters who will decide this election and hate both candidates just got the confirmation they needed to say, "both sides / they're all the same."

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"Closer to outright dementia"

Yeah ok Doc

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oh please... I don't have to be a fucking doctor to have that perception while also having gone through several of these cases with grandparents and Great-grandparents alike. Like... Are ya blind? Show me Obama doing something like that on the debate stage. Hell even show me 2012 Biden doing that.

What a weak cop-out...

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dementia vs old age

I had grandparents too my dude. I'm also not going to argue that he is old, unlike Obama who was 51 at the time, or Like when Biden was 70 in 2012.

Dementia ≠ being old

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay sure I'll cede that. For your part can you go back and read that I wrote, "closer to dementia-like"? Old age, dementia... Whether it truly was dementia or not skirts bottom-line that there is no good excuse for that. The problem is Trump is old but was far more coherent (and simply his usual pathologically-lying self).

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That looked closer to outright dementia, I’m sorry.

that I wrote, “closer to dementia-like”?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I edited incorrectly. Regardless, changes absolutely nothing substantively. "looked closer to" versus "dementia-like". Both imply the same notion.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's already trending on Twitter. The constant throat clearing is a little much. He talks too low also.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A board-certified neurologist stated on NBC the other night that "it is a fact that he has Parkinson's" based on a variety of his behaviors, the slow and low-toned voice being one indicator of many.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If only every doctor could diagnose from a short video. 🙄

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah certainly not kosher to diagnose remotely short of physically visiting with patient or reading their file; but I do suspect it can be pretty obvious for an expert to see whose symptoms are (a) largely on public display, and (b) said behaviors are pretty unique to Parkinson's. But nevertheless, he's the expert not me. Seems pretty obvious to me that Biden is certainly declining.