politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
To those downvoting this comment (and every other comment critical of Biden):
What is the percentage of loss you are willing to accept before you call for Biden's removal from the ticket?
Is it 10%? 20%? 80%?
When will you be willing to consider a different candidate? Surely there's a number...I'd just like to know what it is.
There is no percentage that will sway them. They would rather have Trump than admit they're capable of being wrong.
The hubris is astounding.
Do you think it will ever register in their brains that they are actively attempting to silence dissent? Remind you of anyone?
BlueAnon -_-
Some lefty commentators call them Blue MAGA.
Great name that fits.
Right?
You can't downvote Biden into office you nut-jobs.
The problem is, as I've noted previously, the time to replace him was last September. It's too late at this point.
Here are the scenarios:
Biden runs and loses, which is the current track.
DNC forces Biden out for Harris, who loses, because people hate her more than Biden.
DNC forces both Biden and Harris out for a new candidate, who loses, because voters feel they had no role in choosing the replacement.
The only way I see a "D" win here is for Biden to die in office, Harris steps up and gets a sympathy vote.
Respectfully disagree. It took France a couple of weeks to form the New Popular Front, which just won HUGE. Why wouldn't it be possible to form a similar coalition in the US?
There is zero chance that the DNC steps aside for a third party...
And there's like a 0.0001% chance they pick anyone except Kamala if Biden is replaced.
I think she has a better shot than Joe. Some people think the other way.
If the DNC allowed it, there is plenty of time for a primary. The DNC just isn't going to do that. Because the incoming Dem president gets to set the DNC leadership and party platform. If a Republican wins, the party usually votes to maintain leadership.
So for current leadership when the choices are:
The only way they lose power is #3. If trump wins, they keep power and 2028 is the same shit show we've been living thru.
Understanding doesn't mean I agree with it.
But that's where we're at right now. Biden and the DNC are willing to burn the country down for personal power. And regardless of if he wins or loses, the people in charge of the DNC stay in charge of it.
Because the US doesn't have a Parliamentary system of government.
I'm not talking about forming a new party. I mean forming a coalition.
I'm just tired of hearing "it's too late" when it's quite obviously not too late.
In a non-Parliamentary government, there's nobody to form a coalition with.
OMG, you're making this more difficult than it needs to be.
Ok...coalesce around a new candidate. Find someone fucking else. There's still time and France just proved it. How can you say it's too late?
Because any new candidate has 118 days to rise to prominenance and win the election, that's not enough time.
Oddly specific number. Care to share the law in which this figure is stated?
That’s the number of days until Election Day.
Plus one. Kind of a dumb and flippant comment, especially from a mod, but 🤷🏼♂️.
Democrats keep punching left at those here in the US trying to form coalitions like New Popular Front.
Polling shows that people don't hate Harris more though. In this context she's more popular than both Biden and Trump.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/03/14/kamala-harris-not-popular-beyond-democrats-poll/72944269007/
"The national survey found 52% of registered voters disapprove of her job performance as President Joe Biden's vice president.
About 36% approve of how she’s handling the role, trailing Biden's almost equally dismal 41% approval rating.
Roughly 38% of Americans have a favorable view of Harris, lagging behind Biden, who is viewed favorably by 41% of registered voters. Former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, was viewed favorably by 40% of respondents in the poll."
Perhaps look at more recent polling after Biden'sfailure in the debate, not numbers from May.
[Reuters]
She's more popular with women and independents than Biden, which are two of the main groups Biden has been attempting to court to make up for losing the anti-genocide vote. There are no downsides, Biden's a guarunteed loss, his numbers match up with every losing presidential candidate going back decades.
Harris, while hindered by being in the administration, can also distance herself from Biden's overwhelming support. She doesn't need to say "from the river to the sea", just being wishy washy could give some people the room to vote Democratic for other reasons.
You have to look at aggregate polls, single polls don’t provide a clear picture.
Biden’s approval rating is -19.3 https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/
Trump’s favorability rating is -11.8 https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/
Harris’ approval rating is -12 https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/kamala-harris/
Its a cult downvoting you mang. They are called "Blue Maga".
It's starting to seem that way. Really sad and disappointing how hypocritical people are.
We were supposed to be the party of integrity; the party who stood for what was right; the party who was unafraid to challenge the status quo. Now, it just seems like we are two shitty sides of the same fucking awful coin.
Watching the American experiment fail is truly the most heartbreaking thing I've ever experienced in my life.
For many of us, we've been witness to the cult forming around Biden for quite a long time.
I concur.