this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
175 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37800 readers
272 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853256

To whom it may concern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't blocking a disinfo place a way of fighting disinformation? I don't get it

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Blocking an entire community, service or application blocks access to non disinformation and normal communication too. Instead fight against the specific issues. Or with your logic we need to ban every platform such as Reddit, Facebook, YouTube, Twitch, Discord and even Wikipedia. Because misinformation is everywhere.

I don't want anyone decide for myself what to use. If I want to use Twitter, that should be MY decision, not yours, not the one with the campaign here and certainly not any government.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Every service may be abused to spread misinformation. Here, the complaint isn't that people abuse a service against the owner's will, but that the service is operated to spread misinformation.

One way to address this could be to look at moderation. Is there meaningful moderation to limit misinformation? A service operated to spread misinformation wouldn't moderate it.

[–] halm@leminal.space 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

we need to ban every platform such as Reddit, Facebook, YouTube, Twitch, Discord

Now you're talking.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And Lemmy, Mastodon, Bluesky etc.

[–] halm@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Posting on the fediverse I sort of want to exempt those, but Bluesky can get in the sea too, yeah.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you want to ban the platforms you dont like/use but leave the ones you do?

[–] halm@leminal.space 2 points 1 month ago

No, I use only the platforms I wouldn't want to see get lost eventually. But I see your attempt at a rhetorical gotcha, and I want to recognise that, too.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 6 points 1 month ago

I imagine that Twitter being blocked in Europe might actually lead to some of those sources moving elsewhere to continue to reach their audience. I'm not a big fan of blocking websites either in a general sense, but a I can see why countries would want to avoid having what's happening to the US be repeated within their own borders, and that seems to be a distinct danger with Twitter. There's a pretty good argument to be made that that's literally its purpose at this point.

Dismantling legitimate governments with disinformation seems like a pretty viable power grab strategy for billionaires trying to create a megacorp hellscape where they get to do whatever they want until the planet becomes uninhabitable for humans some time after their own deaths.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There needs to be due process. We can't ban a website because 10k people said it has disinformation. The DSA is the process for combatting disinformation on major platforms, and we should follow it. Twitter is already being sued under the DSA, and they will be banned in the next few months if they do not fulfill their obligations to fight disinformation.

[–] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

Sure, that's fine - except I guess a petition is a petition. It's not binding, it's a way of expressing political will. So if a lot of people go sign it I don't see what the problem is? It's a nice way of shitting on musks neck, rubbing some in his mouth and nose. I guess we should all sign

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is there no disinformation on other social media platforms?

[–] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

I don't know. That isn't the point though, is it?