Sure, a good, functioning hospital is well-staffed and cares most about the health of its patients. Were the USA a hospital, it would NOT fit that description

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And it won't get better as long as patients keep going to that hospital.

Once an emergency (election) is happening, we don't really have a choice, but when we're healthy (non elections years) we can organize and protest the hospital, or just build a new one.

It doesn't make rational sense to just keep going to that's ame doctor or ones just as bad over and over again for decades...

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So would you move all the vulnerable patients to a different hospital? Would you destroy the entire hospital and build it back up while there are patients actively needing care, and loads of people who are vehemently opposed to that? Or would you fix the hospital’s administrative structure without completely destroying it

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I literally just answered that in the comment you replied to when you asked...

Once an emergency (election) is happening, we don’t really have a choice, but when we’re healthy (non elections years) we can organize and protest the hospital, or just build a new one.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Oh… yeah you did. I’m sorry, that’s my bad