this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
266 points (95.9% liked)

News

23121 readers
3300 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 172 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

How is this even possible.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 93 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

When there aren't proper protections in place for frivolous lawsuits. It costs them more to fight than it would to just advertise on the platform. Time for Ben & Jerry's to make an "eat the rich" flavor with Musk's face on the carton to advertise on X!

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago

I mean, lawsuits are still one of the best ways for regular people to hold powerful entities accountable, so I'm super leery of anything that purports to stop "frivolous" lawsuits. I think the real underlying problem here is we're expecting a for profit company to do the right thing in a market environment where doing the right thing isn't the most profitable course of action. What we need to do is change the market environment or find someone that's not a for profit corporation to do the right thing (both admittedly easier said than done).

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 40 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Those with deep pockets can threaten expensive legal action even if they know they won't win, simply because those without deep pockets cannot afford to fight the legal battle without going bankrupt.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 82 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

but its unilever. they have nearly unlimited funds to fight musk... if they wanted to

i suspect they just didnt want the unilever name and its bazillion brands brought into public lawsuits for marketing reasons

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Oh, I know nothing about Unilever specifically, you may be right. In either case, the basic "Cost not worth the price" reasoning still applies.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You probably know some of their brands

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

... a lot of those are repeated multiple times?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I think it's the continents the brands are

Edit: actually "cif" is called "vim" in canada, so maybe there wasn't that much thought put into it.

Here's a Wikipedia list instead.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

To answer the question as written: yes.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

you spelled 'losing potential profits not worth fighting nazis' wrong

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, I mean, that's the gist of it. Corporations are utterly amoral and value only profit, not things like "not helping genocide along" or "preventing fascism".

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

See my response to @Docus. They own half the brands in half the houses in the world.