this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
309 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2361 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 month ago (6 children)

That's still 2.4% on top of the cumulated inflation of the past 5 years...

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 47 points 1 month ago

You misspelled price gouging.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sure. But inflation is down, we didn't go into a recession, and wage growth has been outpacing inflation for over a year now.

This is good, we're going in the right direction. Deflation would be way worse.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We should raise the minimum wage until it is commensurate with the price gouging. All at once, since none of the corporations eased us into higher prices.

But we have zero parties in this country that are willing to raise the minimum wage at the national level.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Going in the right direction is fantastic except that it takes too long to really feel the impact, so all the low information voters will put in a republican, they'll just happen to be in office when the good times hit, but then they'll ruin it completely, which won't be felt until a Democrat takes over, who then will have to clean up the mess, repeat ad infinitum

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

You don't have to go any further than these comments to find plenty of people who have no idea how any of this works. lol

I'm hoping this time you're wrong because there is a whole lot more on the line right now than just the economy.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah but unfortunately that's never going to change. Inflation is the rate of increase and they always want a rate of increase, just at 2%.

It's never going to go negative because growth for the growth gods!! :(

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Line must go up.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, it will never go negative (I hope) because if it goes negative we're probably in for a massive global recession that will introduce untold suffering.

You think they aim for 2% because that's what's good for rich people? 2% is the magic number for the whole economy.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Who taught you that? Remember, economists funded by rich people have obvious biases... And what happens if our salaries and pensions are indexed to the cost of living? Is the reasoning still good?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aaaand now we get to the "don't trust the experts, they're all liars" phase

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Seriously. I didn't realize President Erdogan had a lemmy accout!

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Just learned I was funded by rich people. Did I miss a paycheck somewhere?

-an actual economist, telling you deflation is bad

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Populist candidates used to actually argue for higher inflation. See the free silver movement of the late 19th century. With some inflation present, the real value of all debts goes down over time, as long as you make the interest payments.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

There are many ways that a government could handle excessive debt. Inflation is one method that is to some degree successful, and also to some degree a complete failure in contemporary America. How many people have student loan payments when they graduated college a couple of decades ago? That's just shocking. Which is to say, interest rates are one tool, but at the moment they are not sufficient to handle the problems society is facing.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Who taught you that? Remember, [well poisoning the myriad of sources that would clearly show that's correct]

lol

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

There are already alternatives available that do go negative.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You want a deflationary environment? Are you sure?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

That's what you got from my one line comment?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If "deflationary environment" is neoliberal for "restrictions on and immediate reduction of the current ongoing price gouging" then call me Moleman cuz yes, i want that, right now.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, well, no, it's not. Do you want actual deflation?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I need you to eat my entire sittin muscle. Dont say you don't want to, i can see you enjoy doing it by how you talk. Its a chore speaking with you often i bet.

get to chewing

Dagum smug ass no thinking neoliberals... Always sound like the same 20 something middle manager haha

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's just how inflation works though. Wages tend to rise slower than prices do. In economic terms, wages are "sticky." They rise and fall slower than prices do in response to market conditions. Long periods of slow gradual inflation are fine, as people simply demand that their wages rise at a steady 2-3% to keep up with inflation, and employers expect it. But if there is a sudden spike in prices, it's a lot harder for employees to suddenly negotiate wage increases. Instead, the slower process of labor market competition, employees leaving underpaying jobs for better paying jobs, has to take over. It's going to take a few years for wages to catch up with the spike in prices, but it does happen with time, primarily from people switching jobs.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I've never had a 2% pay raise since I started my career in 2008.

Not by staying in one company anyway. I had to change companies every time and even then it was hard negotiating anything above what I was making before.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The economy would tank really hard if wet somehow deflated it to go back in time. It doesn't work like that.

Plus the last 5 years was almost entirely from covid anyway

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying it should. I'm just saying the rest of us still can't keep up even with 2% because of the cumulative two digits inflation we've had over the past few years on top of it.