this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
993 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21410 readers
925 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 160 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The answer is very much "Don't run Photoshop"

    (Fuck Adobe. There, I said it)

    [–] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "It is always ethical to pirate adobe"

    [–] grue@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    It's never unethical to pirate Adobe, but it's always more ethical to use Free Software instead and deny Adobe the mindshare.

    [–] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    It's far more ethical to make the company lose money

    Minimum amount for photoshop is 22$/month

    Pirate photoshop

    Delete it

    Pirate again

    Repeat 30 times

    Adobe looses 660$

    If everyone does this adobe will loose so much

    [–] kautau@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

    Investors hate this one glitch!

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

    They don't care as they have a massive profit margin. What matters more is the market share. You got to break the standard way of thinking industry wide.

    [–] Rinox@feddit.it 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

    That's not at all how piracy works. They don't lose any money by me not buying their product, the money was never theirs to lose. They can earn money if I buy it, but if I don't, then nothing changed. It's not like every company is entitled to my money.

    Pirating or using Gimp or Krita instead, has the exact same effect on them, ie me not buying their product.

    [–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

    You must be fun at parties.

    [–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

    Lol I've been using cs5 until yesterday. V24 now

    [–] x4740N@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

    Gimp is behind on features and ui optimisation and krita is art focused

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

    Voice of reason

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

    I never understood that argument. Do or do not.

    [–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago
    [–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
    [–] Anivia 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Sadly there is no alternative that is even remotely as capable

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
    [–] 474D@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Well the obvious answer would be all the professional Photoshop capable things man, we can love Linux and still admit there's areas for growth

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

    True but I think most people don't use every feature

    [–] Anivia 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    If you want to edit photos then Affinity is passable, and GIMP is a joke.

    If all you want to do is draw, then Krita is a very capable alternative to Photoshop, but being good at only a specific subset of Photoshop capabilites doesn't turn it into a replacement for it

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

    I make my memes in gimp and it works for me.

    1000004944

    [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

    Depends what you want to do to photos. It just adjustments without trickery, darktable is fantastic.

    [–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

    Gimp has been just fine.

    [–] Ketchup@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, it’s kind of true. I’ve tried a bunch of Lightroom and Photoshop alternatives. Pixelmator and Photomator for iOS and macOS are my absolute favorites. I wish I could get around Affinity software better, but I can do 95% of what I need in Pixelmator. And I love some of the select tools. Bonus: Davinci Resolve is a big switch for Premiere users— but worth it, and even CapCut’s free features can help with the basics.

    [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Fuck I'd love an actual equivalent alternative on Windows too. GIMP, while great in the past, is nowhere near modern Photoshop, it's closer to modern Paint, which is just sad.

    There's a ton of people and businesses that hate Adobe, the lack of real alternatives is fascinating.

    [–] variants@possumpat.io 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Krita, rawtherapee, dark table, digikam, affinity. Just depends what you are trying to do. If you're used to photoshop there's nothing exactly the same and it will take effort to move but I think it's worth it, I'm still on the journey of learning as a hobbyist and have mostly been using dark table for photo editing

    [–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

    Darktable is fine as a hobbyist, but it doesn’t fully replace Lightroom when you get into semi-professional and professional workloads.

    I need to give it another try, but my 12TB raw file library is so unwieldy to manage that I haven’t tried importing it all there. Plus the AI generative removal and Denoising is pretty important to a lot of my workflows.