this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

22839 readers
3655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Tuesday, voters in Crook County passed measure 7-86, which asked voters if they support negotiations to move the Oregon/Idaho border to include Crook County in Idaho.  The measure is passing with 53% of the vote, and makes Crook County the 13th county in eastern Oregon to pass a Greater Idaho measure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

So I am from WA and have been aware of this plan for a while.

This is one phase, and the next phase is to try to do this with as many Eastern WA counties as possible.

And to anyone wondering why this is happening, ya'll obviously are not from around the PNW.

Basically, Seattle, Tacoma and Portland are bastion of liberals and actual leftists. Bellevue is as well, but its only for corpos these days.

Nearly everywhere else west of the cascades is just barely more blue than red, and there are tons of smaller towns with Republican controlled county legislatures and town/city governments.

On the East of the Cascades, in the desert, basically, Republicans are generally in charge of everything that isn't a Reservation.

Its a bit more complex than this, but it is pretty much 'big cities' are blue, mid and small cities and everything else is red.

While I am against this succeeding, I do not think this is as cut and dry, obviously unconstitutional as some other posters here are making it seem.

It is not creating a new state. It is counties voting to leave one state and join another. To the best of my knowledge, this is completely unprecedented in the history of the US.

They've got a whole detailed plan for how to attempt to get this actually done. And they have a lot of judges, and now a popular mandate.

I honestly do not know how this will play out as it will likely hinge on various judiciaries and possibly executive (Governor) moves.

Yes, the state legislatures have to sign off on it and thats a big hurdle to jump, but it may actually be doable if enough political pressure is applied... especially if Trump wins.

It could possibly make it to the Circuit Courts and then the Supreme Court.

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While true, this is true in basically every area in the USA. If you have a tractor supply store near your house, you're in redneck territory. If you have a Lululemon, you're in blue territory.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Funnily enough I have one of each of those within about three miles of my home.

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Found the centrist.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well not going to say, but it is funny because it is a "swing state".

But realistically this specific area is deep blue, but TSC has a healthy enough market, between nearby rural area and suburbanites that want to play farmer with a couple chickens in the backyard and buying their pet food there.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Will this change the number of electoral votes and house representative each state has? Because if not, this seems to benefit Oregon: concentrates Republicans in Idaho while lessening the impact of their vote.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The number of electoral votes and the number of reps is based on population and is decided by the census.

So if this happens, at the latest, the votes would get fixed in 2031. But I wouldn't be surprised if this is part of the deal. Obviously those switching to Idaho want to bring their votes with them.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I describe it like this... the places where people actually live are blue.

The places where there are more square miles than people are red.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Places where people are poorly educated seem to be mostly red too.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It’s not that they’re poorly educated (farmers are typically smart people in very practical ways that city people are not), it’s that they don’t have government services to rely on so they don’t understand why people in the city need it as they see themselves as self sufficient.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we merge Idaho with the rest of the Midwest? It'd be pretty fucking sweet to have less GOP senators.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They wouldn't want that if course.

However, of they do this, then they would likely make an argument for reallocating electors...

[–] Xbeam@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It would reallocate electors as well as congressional seats. Those are both based on population and are already realloated every 10 years.