this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
492 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4529 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I hope so. Biden is old, but his problems with mental acuity were dramatically exaggerated by the media and conservatives. When people asked him questions, he would actually answer them. Meanwhile republicans were “omg he doesn’t even know what room he’s in bro” and that was sort of ridiculous. But then, you have Trump seems not just loopy but insane and deranged, and unlike Biden, he’s always been an idiot. However Trump he gets a pass from these same people. The press has never paid nearly enough attention to how incoherent he is. It gets frustrating because it has to be on purpose.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Of course it's on purpose. Most of the media are owned by oligarchs that support Trump because all they care about is their next tax cut.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Right. The "liberal media" BS has been of the Republican's most successful tactics. Corporate media is not left-wing - it's absurd, but that's what conservatives push and many people fully believe it. Almost all media outlets in the US support conservatives in subtle ways, but people have been trained to think that right/centrist corporate media is rabidly biased towards the left.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

Thanks to years of cutting and gutting education they've made a base for themselves that can't think for themselves and just follow the orders given to them by fox "news".

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Manufacturing consent documented this at great length in the late 80s, and there's absolutely no way it hasn't gotten worse since then.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Yes, but many of the journalists are normal peopke on the left and write. If they are constantly being stifled, they should still be reporting on that or quitting. There is meant to be done integrity in the profession.

Its been gone for many years. Now its just content farms.

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

A lot of Biden was also focused around a brainfart he had during the debate.. I just spent days at an expo, and I had plenty where I lost my chain of thought due to being tired.

And a photo where it looks like he's speaking to nobody.. But they cropped the parachuter out.

Whereas, Trump constantly makes major mistakes for things he should know. And it is in general incoherent rambling. I'm a total introvert and even I don't fuck up the way Trump does (ie, completely mixing up people and names constantly).

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because he's always been an idiot he set the right expectations, let that be a lesson for any of you getting into politics

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

It worked for GW Bush, too... come off as sorta dense and dopey, then people will act pleasantly surprised when you exceed expectations vs. be critical for falling short of them.