this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
486 points (85.0% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
543 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 110 points 2 months ago (6 children)

YT premium is a good value for me and my family. Guess I'm evil.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

Literally Satan.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Same. I watch more YouTube than probably any other streaming service. Plus I got the family plan and I sell the extra seats to my extended family and friends. Works out to be pretty cheap in the end.

I do the same for Spotify, Disney plus. Formally Netflix but they cut down on password sharing

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If you have YouTube premium, why do you have Spotify? YouTube music is comparable and better in some cases.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't pay for either but I use both and the youtube music desktop ui is really really bad. Plus the annoying thing of it often playing music videos instead of the normal song. I definitely like it better on mobile though

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can toggle video or song. I actually like yt music way more because it can play pretty much anything on YT, including hours and hours of mixes you won't find on Spotify.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can't really toggle video or song though, you can toggle video or thumbnail to video with video audio

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I've had a different experience. When I have it on video, it'll play the music video version, and when I have it on song, it'll play the studio version. Maybe that doesn't work for every song, but it definitely has worked that way for me.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly it's the social aspect. Everyone I know uses Spotify, so sharing playlists and tracks are super easy. I know there's converters out there but I can't be arsed to do that every time I want to send or receive a link. I've also got some shared playlists between friends we all contribute to. At social gathering I can turn on the party mode or whatever it's called and let people add stuff to the queue. The big one though is I've got a few friends with really good taste. I can check in on them from time to time to see what they're listening to right now. Found a lot of great stuff this way.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It definitely is better, but it sill has some stupid quirks that in some cases could probably be fixed by few lines of code, like not locking the screen when you are on the lyrics screen. It also is very slow to start-up in offline mode, which drives me nuts. But otherwise it is much better performant than Spotify and has better ways to listen to new music, instead of the dumb intelligent randomize feature on Spotify.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I wish I could be as pleased with it. I don't want to pay for a service and have that service still collect data on me to push ads elsewhere.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's everything. Netflix, buying groceries with a credit card, even driving your new car.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to be this way. Somewhere in the past something went wrong.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

No. Nothing went wrong. Just nobody cares how anything works just so long as it does.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Mate, you can't use basically anything today then. Your car probably collects data on you. I'm not saying I love it, but life's too short for me to cut everything trying to collect my data out of my life. Gotta pick and choose my battles.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

If you block ads everywhere else then it doesn’t really matter. Pi.hole, AdGuard, proton vpn, Firefox will all block ads for you on pretty much every other site on the planet.

[–] mub@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My 3 kids all use iPhone and we have a bunch of chrome casts. The only practical way to avoid the ads in YTP.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] mub@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Your tight pants

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

get a good adblocker and donate that money to them instead.

thatd probably be the best value.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do use an adblocker, and I'll keep spending my money how I please, thanks.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

everyone can use their money for whatever stupid thing they please

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You subscribe to every single channel you watch on Patreon? That’s remarkable!

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

paying for youtubers

Like it or not the platform is full of people trying to make a living independently producing content. Most of them are not making very much money. Watching with an adblocker means they aren’t earning any revenue, which is unsustainable. Watching with a Premium subscription means I don’t see ads and they get more revenue (even more so than ad-supported views).

Those people aren’t massive corporations. They’re independent creators. And generally speaking the content I watch on YouTube is content I want to support.

I’m not trying to say it’s like, inherently ethically wrong to watch YouTube without ads or Premium. But it certainly isn’t ethically superior.