this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
518 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3898 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why didn't he go with DeSantis?

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because Desantis challenged him in the primary. It's as simple and petty as that.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And also remember that the VP can Amendment 25 Trump straight out of office on day one (with some help from the cabinet), and will even have a plausible reason to do so. Trump has to be paranoid about his VP pick.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The GOP is too scared of pissing off Trump or his base to even consider doing something like that. If they were a smart evil organization they would have dumped Trump long ago.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Perhaps. Think about it from Trump's perspective. How much does he trust any of them?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, not at all, nor should he. I just know they're too cowardly to do it.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump is a useful idiot. Vance is Thiel-backed Heritage Foundation pick. As will likely most of his cabinet.

After Jan 20, regardless of which way the next 5 months go, he is useless to the GOP, Heritage, and Thiel. In fact, if anything he'd be a liability to them.

This wouldn't surprise me in the least.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what I thought when he lost in 2020. Yet they stuck with him anyway. Clearly they've decided they need his cult, no matter what.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

First term they were flying by the seat of their pants. They were the dog that caught the car.

Second term they won't need him anymore. They've got plans. They've got courts. They've even already got some of the legislation.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The fun thing is that De Santis could Amendment 12 Trump straight out of office, as they both live in Florida.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

Trump wants a pretty nonentity.

Pence looked like a 1960s TV version of a Vice President. Vance looked like someone the rural MAGoos would like.

DeSantis might actually [accidentally] tell Trump the truth...

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

He wants loyalty, and one that will do what Pence didn't do.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

he did. JD Vance is one of those ironic punishments Olympians gave to people that pissed them off. someone with as much ability to come off as human, let alone normal, as desantis, if not less.