this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

Trains

841 readers
1 users here now

Everything about trains and railroads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gieselbrecht 11 points 3 months ago (5 children)

It's funny to read this article painting electric trains as a great novelty, when the majority of trains in western Europe (excluding certain island states) have been electric for decades. But good for california, sounds like a nice improvement!

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I just loved seeing electric rail referred to in a positive manner, and to see the benefits (speed! quiet! comfort! land use!) highlighted.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Or that the Northeast Corridor (DC>Philly>NYC>Boston) is all electrified and has the fastest passenger train on the continent (Amtrak Acela can do 150mph, soon to be replaced with a 165mph variant that can do like +30 in turns). And that NJ Transit on that line (following US 1 and I-95) is electric along that massive population concentration. But yeah, good for California. I get it, running power is a really expensive project but at least this section goes back at least as far as the GG1 loco days.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I was really surprised. I would have assumed the vast majority of commuter rail was electric, it’s certainly been true for the rail I’ve taken.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

America is a petrostate that uses diesel and coal for most industrial purposes and trains have usually been used as cargo movers and not people movers, so they usually use diesel.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

Yeah it’s not very impressive, electrifying one commuter line, when China now has 45,000 km of high speed electric lines.