this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
866 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Waveform@lemmy.world 40 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (22 children)

enforce fair housing laws

Hopefully this includes not kicking out people who can still pay rent, just so the landlord can have themselves a weekend vacation cabin or higher-priced rental. And there should be a law forcing landlords to offer a rent-to-own option. Also, how about recalculating inflation to account for every expense that has gone up, so that the percentage a landlord can raise rent each year isn't so damned high. While we're being fair, of course :|

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 31 points 4 weeks ago (21 children)

I agree with everything you said except for this:

And there should be a law forcing landlords to offer a rent-to-own option.

I generally don't think there should be laws forcing individual citizens to sell anything they own. I could however be on board with government regulated and incentivized rent-to-own programs.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Honestly, I don't feel like landlords should even exist

Sure, maybe renting can still exist, as long as it's cheaper and government run or something. I would much much rather give my rent to the government than some rich fuck who literally gets my money for free

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whether or not they should exist is basically irrelevant. They do and that's not something we're likely to see change. Also, sometimes renting is a better fit for people at certain phases of their life.

In exchange for a reasonable rent, a landlord is responsible for ensuring that the building is kept safe and well maintained and that any necessary repairs happen as quickly as is reasonably possible. What I'd really like to see is landlords being held accountable for failing to do so.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In exchange for a reasonable rent, a landlord is responsible for ensuring that the building is kept safe and well maintained and that any necessary repairs happen as quickly as is reasonably possible. What I’d really like to see is landlords being held accountable for failing to do so.

Most of the lack of enforcement is for obvious reasons (landlords lobby and in some cases run the government), but there's also a practical constraint: individual renters in a building tend to litigate this individually.

It should be easier to either start up a class action lawsuit, or there should be a mechanism to "unionize" renters in large buildings automatically or something. Slumlords are a very real thing, and there ought to be a better way to litigate them out of existence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)