this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
43 points (68.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27268 readers
1595 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn't seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's a pretty high percentage.

But it's a pretty high percentage for similar reasons to illegal pot sales funding terrorists or gangs/cartels. The legal status puts it way more in the purview of organized crime.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, is it a high percentage? Feels like the kind of thing that you could fudge figures either way.

And yeah, we need to empower sex workers and give them legal and health support.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

In the context of women being literal sex slaves, even 5 or 10% would constitute a high percentage that gave regular purchasers a reasonably high chance of encountering one. (I wasn't intending to play that semantics game, but it's worth noting regardless.)

I think it's pretty high. There are legal places that have some safeguards in place, but in most of the world there's just nowhere for a woman to say "I'd like to try sex work" and get an opportunity to do so. It's inherently the people on the fringes of society, the runaways with nowhere to go who end up reliant on a predator, the people addicted to drugs that have no way to get their next fix, the people trafficked. Even the "high class" stuff, because there isn't any legitimate entry point, is relying on tactics like calling it a modeling gig and then propositioning the models, and there's an inherent element of coercion* to that as well.

*Coercion isn't the perfect word choice but I'm blanking on a better one. Even if the intent isn't explicitly to manipulate the women, the result is a lot of wild emotional swings, then a pitch when you're still under their influence. And we've seen examples of people taken overseas and having their passports taken away, even by an NFL team. It definitely happens at a far more frequent level than we should be comfortable with.

I also know that male prostitution is a thing, and "women" isn't comprehensive. But it's mostly women.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

I agree with pretty much everything you've said. I've just seen "it's a high percentage" to be a dogwhistle for "all sex work is inherently exploitation so we should ban it.", so apologies for assuming.

5-10% is far too high, yes. I don't know if I'd agree with that figure (it really depends on what you consider sex work, tbh), but exploitation is a serious problem that needs fixing.