politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
The original image is so much better. No need to add a dipshit, just the VP nominee with a baby pig.
I don't like the whole "down to earth politician I could get a beer with" thing, but I legitimately don't think I can picture trump or vance looking happy with a farm animal, and I think that says something about them as peoplecin a way that's different than just "down to earth".
You should look like that if you're at a fair and someone hands you a piglet. It's just a funny, cute thing that's supposed to make people happy.
The closest was when Trump tried to pose for a photo op with a bald eagle and the eagle attacked him
If we were in a novel or a movie the critics would have called that symbolism too heavy-handed. Of course they also would have said it is too unrealistic to have millions of dimwits voting for a con man because they are all racist.
Seeing this for the first time was the best part of my day.
I love it so much that this was real. The joke writes itself
I think the range of clothing I can picture them in is suit or golf polo. They just exude the energy of rich boys who don't want to do anything "beneath their station".
I bet neither has ever made their own bed.
Vance probably has as he was in the military. Even a cushy press job has to make his own bed. But I'm sure he's put that all behind him and now thinks of that as work for the servants.
The "get a beer with" thing is about trust and being comfortable. Sounds like, "handing him a piglet" is your version of this. His reaction makes you trust and be comfortable with him as a decent human.
I vote, you now use the phrase, "I'd hand that guy a piglet." And make it your own.
Makes a lot of sense when you put it like that. :)
I felt funny about it because I don't generally need my politicians to be "down to earth" because exceptional people are often not and that's fine, but I do need them to have that human joy of a baby animal, even if they're not a pet owner or anything.
Definitely appreciate the insight that it's related, but different qualities being desired. :). Definitely going to use that phrase now.
Trump couldn't pull off holding a book for fuck's sake. And this guy, he's just charming. He's a big lovable oaf.
I dunno, I liked the one with the sleepy Trumplet.
how long before the inevitable "national guard isn't real army men!!!" talking point is flying around?
Damn, Walz made CSM?
You see, Republicans saying that exact thing would've been smart. It's both true (as an acronym for his rank), but also dangerously close to "CSAM" that idiots would be up in arms about the guy being a predator.
Still would be an incredibly scummy thing to do to attack opponents, but that might have actually achieved something for those amoral fuckwits.
Republicans don't know what the fuck CSAM is. "CSAM" is just the leftist euphemism treadmill for CP.
I never said the idiots had to be Republicans. "Both sides equally bad" centrists would do just fine for spreading misinformation.
Good point.