tuhriel

joined 1 year ago
[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks really nice definitely gonna take a look at it.

And, did I read that correctly: the pro licence is a onetime payment and you keep the all the current features even after the licence expires?

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

For me it gets a bit confused if I add or remove the external screens.

Usually it is fixed if I quit and restart flameshot

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For me it depends how "hardened" the account needs to be.

For key accounts I keep the 2fa seperated (where possible with a fido token) For not so relevant accounts I add it to bitwarden. Because I probably wouldnt activate 2fa for these accounts if I'd have to pull out the phone each time

Edit: you also can add the 2fa token to a separate vault

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 7 points 1 month ago

Hey, hey...pssst you forgot to update the template to the your current crypto!

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago

Also, it might be annonymized for this dataset, by adding more 'annonymized' datasets stuff can be correlated

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 56 points 2 months ago (22 children)

I'm happy to dunk on musk as much as the next guy, but that title is bull.

Lightyears measure distance not time, how can they mess that up?

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I likebthat, but I think this misses the part where a company pulls it from all markets, which should be states specificly.

If you don't offer it anymore, you are not allowed to keep the copyright or patent.

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago

If I have to choose between a company that freely sells and uses all my data versus a company that e2e encrypts my data and only complies with police and intelligence agency if it is specifically mandated by a swiss judge (and are fighing against it[1]), my money is definitely on the later

Is it perfect? Probably not. - Does it match my thread model? Definitely yes!

Also their privacy policy [2] allows to make a pretty well informed decision and map it against your thread model

And by the way, here's the statement of the ceo regading the activist: https://proton.me/blog/climate-activist-arrest

[1] https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/business/proton-wins-appeal-in-swiss-court-over-surveillance-laws/47052196 [2] https://proton.me/legal/privacy

[–] tuhriel@infosec.pub 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Die Problematik mit "nicht sagen dürfen" ist in vielen Bereichen nur eine halbpatzige Lösung. Du kannst (ohne massiven Überwachungsapperat) nicht komplett verhindern, dass die Aussagen gemacht werden. Die entsprechenden "Täter" verdrücken sich in den Untergrund wo ihr faules Gedankengut unkontrolliert und ohne Gegenworte vor sich hin gärt, bis der Topf überschäumt.

Die Leute müssen mitbder realen Welt und echten Reaktionen ausserhalb ihrer Bubble konfrontiert werden...

Die Problematik liegt dran, dass jede Bubble selbst Gegenstimmen versucht auszugrenzen (ist auch kein neues Konzept), aber mit aktivem "de-platforming" können sie sich auch noch die Opferrolle auf die Stirn schreibeln...